Enhanced frontal activation underlies sparing from the attentional blink: Evidence from human electrophysiology
Using the ERP method, we examined the processing operations elicited by stimuli that appear within the same temporal attention window. Forty subjects searched for letter targets among digit distractors displayed in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). ERPs were examined under conditions where a...
Saved in:
Published in | Psychophysiology Vol. 53; no. 5; pp. 623 - 633 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0048-5772 1469-8986 1469-8986 1540-5958 |
DOI | 10.1111/psyp.12618 |
Cover
Summary: | Using the ERP method, we examined the processing operations elicited by stimuli that appear within the same temporal attention window. Forty subjects searched for letter targets among digit distractors displayed in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). ERPs were examined under conditions where a single target was embedded among distractors and compared to those recorded when two consecutive targets were embedded among distractors. Standard and independent component analyses revealed two temporally and topographically distinct ERP responses, a midfrontal P3a component peaking at about 300 ms followed by a midparietal P3b component peaking at about 450 ms. With minimal latency variations, the frontal P3a was amplified when elicited by two consecutive targets relative to a single target. The parietal P3b response was also amplified when elicited by two consecutive targets compared to a single target but, in contrast to P3a, it was also associated with a substantially longer time course. These results provide evidence for the involvement of frontal brain regions in the close‐to‐concurrent selection of two consecutive targets displayed in RSVP, and of posterior brain regions in the serial encoding of targets in visual working memory. The present findings are discussed in relation to current models of temporal gating of attention and the attentional blink effect. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-PM6NFQJ5-X ArticleID:PSYP12618 NEURAT - No. STPD11B8HM istex:62FFD37CACE43B24339436983D30D1E24B1C978F This research was supported by Grant NEURAT STPD11B8HM awarded to RD'A. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0048-5772 1469-8986 1469-8986 1540-5958 |
DOI: | 10.1111/psyp.12618 |