Preventive Effect of Pretreatment with Intravenous Nicorandil on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients with Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Angiography (PRINCIPLE Study)

To investigate the effect of pretreatment with intravenous nicorandil on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography. This randomized controlled multicenter study enrolled a total of 166 patients (nicorandil n=81; control n=8...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inYonsei medical journal Vol. 54; no. 4; pp. 957 - 964
Main Authors Ko, Young-Guk, Lee, Byoung-Kwon, Kang, Woong Chol, Moon, Jae-Youn, Cho, Yun Hyeong, Choi, Seong Hun, Hong, Myeong-Ki, Jang, Yangsoo, Kim, Jong-Youn, Min, Pil-Ki, Kwon, Hyuck-Moon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Yonsei University College of Medicine 01.07.2013
연세대학교의과대학
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0513-5796
1976-2437
1976-2437
DOI10.3349/ymj.2013.54.4.957

Cover

More Information
Summary:To investigate the effect of pretreatment with intravenous nicorandil on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography. This randomized controlled multicenter study enrolled a total of 166 patients (nicorandil n=81; control n=85) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min. Nicorandil 12 mg dissolved in 100 mL of 0.9% saline was administered intravenously for 30 minutes just prior to coronary angiography in the nicorandil group. The same volume of only saline was given to the control group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CIN, defined as >0.5 mg/dL increase or >25% rise in serum creatinine (SCr) concentration within 48 hours of contrast exposure compared to baseline. The final analysis included 149 patients (nicorandil n=73; control n=76). The baseline characteristics and the total volume of the used contrast (Iodixanol, 125.6±69.1 mL vs. 126.9±74.6 mL, p=0.916) were similar between the two groups. The incidence of CIN also did not differ between the nicorandil and control groups (6.8% vs. 6.6%, p=0.794). There was no difference between the two groups in the relative change in SCr from baseline to peak level within 48 hours after coronary angiography (-1.58±24.07% vs. 0.96±17.49%, p=0.464), although the nicorandil group showed less absolute change in SCr than the control group (-0.01±0.43 mg/mL vs. 0.02±0.31 mg/mL, p=0.005). Prophylactic intravenous infusion of nicorandil did not decrease the incidence of CIN in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
http://www.eymj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/0069YMJ/ymj-54-957.pdf
G704-000409.2013.54.4.022
ISSN:0513-5796
1976-2437
1976-2437
DOI:10.3349/ymj.2013.54.4.957