Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: The PROST-QA/RP2 Consortium
Purpose:Our goal was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in a multicenter study.Materials and Methods:We evaluated men with localized prostate cancer at 11 high-volume academic medical centers in the Unite...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of urology Vol. 207; no. 1; pp. 127 - 136 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia, PA
Wolters Kluwer
01.01.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0022-5347 1527-3792 1527-3792 |
DOI | 10.1097/JU.0000000000002176 |
Cover
Summary: | Purpose:Our goal was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in a multicenter study.Materials and Methods:We evaluated men with localized prostate cancer at 11 high-volume academic medical centers in the United States from the PROST-QA (2003-2006) and the PROST-QA/RP2 cohorts (2010-2013) with a pre-specified goal of comparing RALP (549) and ORP (545). We measured longitudinal patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at pre-treatment and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months, and pathological and perioperative outcomes/complications.Results:Demographics, cancer characteristics, and margin status were similar between surgical approaches. ORP subjects were more likely to undergo lymphadenectomy (89% vs 47%; p <0.01) and nerve sparing (94% vs 89%; p <0.01). RALP vs ORP subjects experienced less mean intraoperative blood loss (192 vs 805 mL; p <0.01), shorter mean hospital stay (1.6 vs 2.1 days; p <0.01), and fewer blood transfusions (1% vs 4%; p <0.01), wound infections (2% vs 4%; p=0.02), other infections (1% vs 4%; p <0.01), deep venous thromboses (0.5% vs 2%; p=0.04), and bladder neck contractures requiring dilation (1.6% vs 8.3%; p <0.01). RALP subjects reported less pain (p=0.04), less activity interference (p <0.01) and higher incision satisfaction (p <0.01). Surgical approach (RALP vs ORP) was not a significant predictor of longitudinal HRQOL change in any HRQOL domain.Conclusions:In high-volume academic centers, RALP and ORP patients may expect similar long-term HRQOL outcomes. Overall, RALP patients have less pain, shorter hospital stays, and fewer post-surgical complications such as blood transfusions, infections, deep venous thromboses, and bladder neck contractures. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Correspondence: Prostate Cancer Care Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Rabb 440, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 (telephone: 617-667-3739; FAX: 617-667-7292; email: pchang@bidmc.harvard.edu).Funding: PROST-QA and PROST-QA/RP2 Consortium funded by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 CA95662, RC1 CA146596, and RC1 EB011001, as well as the Winship Cancer Institute Fund-a-Cure Initiative from the Dunwoody Country Club. Dr. Chang is supported by a Urology Care Foundation Research Scholar Award, the Martin and Diane Trust Career Development Chair in Surgery, and the Movember Foundation.Jim Hu: supported by "The Frederick J. and Theresa Dow Wallace Fund of the New York Community Trust," PCORI CER-2019C1-15682, PCORI CER-2019C2-17372, and NCI RO1 CA241758. Matthew Cooperberg: none. Peter Carroll: none. Eric Klein: none. Adam Kibel consults for Dendreon and Sanofi. Gerald Andriole: none. Misop Han: none. Alan Partin: none. David Wood: none. Catrina Crociani: none. Thomas Greenfield: none. Dattatraya Patil: none. Larry Hembroff: none. Kyle Davis: none. Linda Stork: none. Daniel Spratt: none. John Wei: none. Martin Sanda: none.Attestation: Dr. Chang had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.Trial Registration: NCT01325506: Effectiveness of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy (PROSTQA- RP2). ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-5347 1527-3792 1527-3792 |
DOI: | 10.1097/JU.0000000000002176 |