A sensitive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of natural and synthetic steroid estrogens in seawater and marine biota, with a focus on proposed Water Framework Directive Environmental Quality Standards

• Published in: Rapid communications in mass spectrometry Vol. 27; no. 7; pp. 738 - 746
• Main Authors: Ronan, Jenny M., McHugh, Brendan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 15.04.2013; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Animals; Chromatography, Liquid - methods; Chromatography, Liquid - standards; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Environmental Monitoring - standards; Environmental quality; Estradiol Congeners - analysis; Estrogens; Liquid chromatography; Marine; Mass spectrometry; Mytilus - chemistry; Sea water; Seawater - chemistry; Sensitivity and Specificity; Solid Phase Extraction; Sonication; Steroids; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - standards; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
• ISSN: 0951-4198; 1097-0231; 1097-0231
• DOI: 10.1002/rcm.6505

RATIONALE Trace levels of natural and synthetic steroid estrogens estrone (E1), 17β‐estradiol (E2) and 17α‐ethynyl estradiol (EE2) have been demonstrated to exert adverse effects in exposed organisms. E2 and EE2 have been proposed for inclusion in the Water Framework Directive (WFD) list of priority pollutants; however, the detection and accurate quantification of these compounds provide significant challenges, due to the low detection limits required. METHODS A sensitive method combining ultrasonication, solid‐phase extraction (SPE) and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, with electrospray ionisation in negative mode (LC/ESI‐MS/MS), capable of determining E1, E2 and EE2 at concentrations between 0.07 and 60 ng/L for seawater and between 0.4 and 200 ng/g wet weight in Mytilus spp. is reported. Recoveries at the limit of quantification (LOQ) ranged from 95 to 102% and 88 to 100% for water and tissue, respectively. Salinity (12 to 35‰) and typical marine particulate matter loadings (between 10 and 100 mg/L) were not found to affect analyte recoveries. RESULTS The first detection of E1 by LC/MS/MS in Irish marine waters (Dublin Bay, at 0.76 ng/L) is reported. Steroids were not detected in Galway Bay, or in any mussel samples from Dublin, Galway and Clare. The level of E2 detected in the dissolved water phase was below the proposed WFD Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) in other surface waters. CONCLUSIONS The proposed method is suitable for the detection of E1, E2 and EE2 at biologically relevant concentrations and, due to the specificity offered, is not subject to potential interferences from endogenous E1 and E2 which often complicate the interpretation of estrogenic biomarker assays. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.