Comparing isolated-check visual evoked potential, pattern visual evoked potential, and standard automated perimetry in dysthyroid optic neuropathy eyes

Objective To determine the diagnostic ability of isolated-check visual evoked potential (icVEP), pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP), and standard automated perimetry (SAP) between dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) without DON (non-DON). Methods This is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEye (London) Vol. 35; no. 9; pp. 2556 - 2563
Main Authors Qi, Xin, Tong, Boding, Hu, Weikun, Luo, Ban
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.09.2021
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0950-222X
1476-5454
1476-5454
DOI10.1038/s41433-020-01274-3

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective To determine the diagnostic ability of isolated-check visual evoked potential (icVEP), pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP), and standard automated perimetry (SAP) between dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) without DON (non-DON). Methods This is a case-control study, 49 bilateral patients (26 DON and 23 non-DON) were included. icVEP, pVEP, and SAP were conducted in all the subjects, icVEP parameters compared were signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) under 8, 16, and 32% depth of modulation (DOM). pVEP parameters compared were amplitude and latency. SAP parameters were mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination index (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied for analysis. Results In icVEP, values of SNR in DON were significantly smaller than non-DON ( p  < 0.05). In pVEP, P100 latent time in DON was significantly larger than non-DON ( p  = 0.0026). In SAP, value of PSD in DON was larger than non-DON ( p  = 0.0006), and value of MD in DON was smaller ( p  = 0.0007). AUC, NRI, and IDI among the three tests were not significantly different. DCA showed that SNR of icVEP under 8% DOM was the farthest from the two extreme curves. Conclusions icVEP, pVEP, and SAP have equal diagnostic capabilities to discern between DON and non-DON. In addition, icVEP may represent a significant ancillary diagnostic approach to DON detection, with more clinical benefit.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0950-222X
1476-5454
1476-5454
DOI:10.1038/s41433-020-01274-3