Effects of Contrast Phases on Automated Measurements of Muscle Quantity and Quality Using CT

• Published in: Korean journal of radiology Vol. 22; no. 11; pp. 1909 - 1917
• Main Authors: Kim, Dong Wook, Kim, Kyung Won, Ko, Yousun, Park, Taeyong, Lee, Jeongjin, Lee, Jung Bok, Ha, Jiyeon, Ahn, Hyemin, Sung, Yu Sub, Kim, Hong-Kyu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) The Korean Society of Radiology 01.11.2021; 대한영상의학회
• Subjects: Abdomen; Arteries; Automation; Body composition; Body mass index; Contrast Media; Humans; Investigations; Medical imaging; Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging; Musculoskeletal system; Portal Vein; Quality standards; Sarcopenia; Technology, Experiment, and Physics; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; 방사선과학; Sarcopenia; Contrast phase; Muscle; Imaging; Body composition
• ISSN: 1229-6929; 2005-8330; 2005-8330
• DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0105

Muscle quantity and quality can be measured with an automated system on CT. However, the effects of contrast phases on the muscle measurements have not been established, which we aimed to investigate in this study. Muscle quantity was measured according to the skeletal muscle area (SMA) measured by a convolutional neural network-based automated system at the L3 level in 89 subjects undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT comprising unenhanced phase, arterial phase, portal venous phase (PVP), or delayed phase imaging. Muscle quality was analyzed using the mean muscle density and the muscle quality map, which comprises normal and low-attenuation muscle areas (NAMA and LAMA, respectively) based on the muscle attenuation threshold. The SMA, mean muscle density, NAMA, and LAMA were compared between PVP and other phases using paired tests. Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the inter-phase variability between PVP and other phases. Based on the cutoffs for low muscle quantity and quality, the counts of individuals who scored lower than the cutoff values were compared between PVP and other phases. All indices showed significant differences between PVP and other phases ( < 0.001 for all). The SMA, mean muscle density, and NAMA increased during the later phases, whereas LAMA decreased during the later phases. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean differences between PVP and other phases ranged -2.1 to 0.3 cm² for SMA, -12.0 to 2.6 cm² for NAMA, and -2.2 to 9.9 cm² for LAMA.The number of patients who were categorized as low muscle quantity did not significant differ between PVP and other phases ( ≥ 0.5), whereas the number of patients with low muscle quality significantly differed ( ≤ 0.002). SMA was less affected by the contrast phases. However, the muscle quality measurements changed with the contrast phases to greater extents and would require a standardization of the contrast phase for reliable measurement.