A Delay-variation-aware High-level Synthesis Algorithm for RDR Architectures

As device feature size drops, interconnection delays often exceed gate delays. We have to incorporate interconnection delays even in high-level synthesis. Using RDR architectures is one of the effective solutions to this problem. At the same time, process and delay variation also becomes a serious p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIPSJ Transactions on System LSI Design Methodology Vol. 7; pp. 81 - 90
Main Authors Hagio, Yuta, Yanagisawa, Masao, Togawa, Nozomu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Information Processing Society of Japan 2014
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1882-6687
1882-6687
DOI10.2197/ipsjtsldm.7.81

Cover

More Information
Summary:As device feature size drops, interconnection delays often exceed gate delays. We have to incorporate interconnection delays even in high-level synthesis. Using RDR architectures is one of the effective solutions to this problem. At the same time, process and delay variation also becomes a serious problem which may result in several timing errors. How to deal with this problem is another key issue in high-level synthesis. In this paper, we propose a delay-variation-aware high-level synthesis algorithm for RDR architectures. We first obtain a non-delayed scheduling/binding result and, based on it, we also obtain a delayed scheduling/binding result. By adding several extra functional units to vacant RDR islands, we can have a delayed scheduling/binding result so that its latency is not much increased compared with the non-delayed one. After that, we similarize the two scheduling/binding results by repeatedly modifying their results. We can finally realize non-delayed and delayed scheduling/binding results simultaneously on RDR architecture with almost no area/performance overheads and we can select either one of them depending on post-silicon delay variation. Experimental results show that our algorithm successfully reduces delayed scheduling/binding latency by up to 42.9% compared with the conventional approach.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1882-6687
1882-6687
DOI:10.2197/ipsjtsldm.7.81