Clinical course of asymptomatic duodenal subepithelial lesions

Background/Aims: There is limited knowledge regarding the management of duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs) owing to a lack of understanding of their natural course. This study aimed to assess the natural course of asymptomatic duodenal SELs and provide management recommendations.Methods: Patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Korean journal of internal medicine Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 603 - 611
Main Authors Kang, Seokin, Park, Kwangbeom, Kim, Do Hoon, Kim, Yuri, Lee, Jeong Hoon, Ahn, Ji Yong, Jung, Kee Wook, Choi, Kee Don, Song, Ho June, Lee, Gin Hyug, Jung, Hwoon-Yong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Association of Internal Medicine 01.07.2024
The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
대한내과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1226-3303
2005-6648
2005-6648
DOI10.3904/kjim.2023.358

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background/Aims: There is limited knowledge regarding the management of duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs) owing to a lack of understanding of their natural course. This study aimed to assess the natural course of asymptomatic duodenal SELs and provide management recommendations.Methods: Patients diagnosed with duodenal SELs and followed up for a minimum of 6 months were retrospectively investigated.Results: Among the 443,533 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy between 2008 and 2020, duodenal SELs were identified in 0.39% (1,713 patients). Among them, 396 duodenal SELs were monitored for a median period of 72.5 months (interquartile range, 37.7–111.3 mo). Of them, 16 SELs (4.0%) showed substantial changes in size or morphology at a median follow-up of 35.1 months (interquartile range, 21.7–51.4 mo). Of these SELs with substantial changes, tissues of two SELs were acquired using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: one was a lipoma and the other was non-diagnostic. Three SELs were surgically or endoscopically removed; two were diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and one was a lipoma. An initial size of 20 mm or larger was associated with substantial changes during follow-up (p = 0.016).Conclusions: While the majority of duodenal SELs may not exhibit substantial interval changes, regular follow-up with endoscopy may be necessary for cases with an initial size of 20 mm or larger, considering a possibility of malignancy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
ISSN:1226-3303
2005-6648
2005-6648
DOI:10.3904/kjim.2023.358