Problem-based learning (PBL): Assessing students’ learning preferences using vark

This study was conducted to describe learning styles of third year nursing students. An interventional study Setting: a public university in Jordan. Used a purposive sample of 92 nursing students who were enrolled in maternity nursing course. Measure the difference in learning styles of nursing stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNurse education today Vol. 28; no. 5; pp. 572 - 579
Main Authors Alkhasawneh, Israa M., Mrayyan, Majd T., Docherty, Charles, Alashram, Safaa, Yousef, Hamzeh Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Scotland Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2008
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0260-6917
1532-2793
DOI10.1016/j.nedt.2007.09.012

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study was conducted to describe learning styles of third year nursing students. An interventional study Setting: a public university in Jordan. Used a purposive sample of 92 nursing students who were enrolled in maternity nursing course. Measure the difference in learning styles of nursing students after introducing an intervention of PBL as a teaching methodology. The dominant learning preference of the students was the read/write preference followed by the kinesthetic, still most of the students represented a multimodal learning preference. No significant difference was found between males and females. A significant difference in the learning preferences of the students in the pre-post test was found. In the pretest the mean of the total VARK score 13.9 (SD = 2) where as in the post test the mean of the total VARK score = 16.5 (SD = 3.5). In the pre-test 54% of students had a multimodal preference whereas 68% of students have a multimodal preference post-test. Most students are able to learn effectively as long as the instructor provides different learning activities in the areas assessed in VARK. Active learning might be enhanced in large classrooms by presenting models and demonstrations, discussions, debates, answering questions, and role playing.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ISSN:0260-6917
1532-2793
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2007.09.012