2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Arthritis, and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Objective To provide updated guidelines for pharmacologic management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), focusing on treatment of oligoarthritis, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis, and systemic JIA with and without macrophage activation syndrome. Recommendations regarding tapering and disc...
Saved in:
Published in | Arthritis care & research (2010) Vol. 74; no. 4; pp. 521 - 537 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Boston, USA
Wiley Periodicals, Inc
01.04.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2151-464X 2151-4658 2151-4658 |
DOI | 10.1002/acr.24853 |
Cover
Summary: | Objective
To provide updated guidelines for pharmacologic management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), focusing on treatment of oligoarthritis, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis, and systemic JIA with and without macrophage activation syndrome. Recommendations regarding tapering and discontinuing treatment in inactive systemic JIA are also provided.
Methods
We developed clinically relevant Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low). A Voting Panel including clinicians and patients/caregivers achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations.
Results
Similar to those published in 2019, these JIA recommendations are based on clinical phenotypes of JIA, rather than a specific classification schema. This guideline provides recommendations for initial and subsequent treatment of JIA with oligoarthritis, TMJ arthritis, and systemic JIA as well as for tapering and discontinuing treatment in subjects with inactive systemic JIA. Other aspects of disease management, including factors that influence treatment choice and medication tapering, are discussed. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low in quality. For that reason, more than half of the recommendations are conditional.
Conclusion
This clinical practice guideline complements the 2019 American College of Rheumatology JIA and uveitis guidelines, which addressed polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and uveitis. It serves as a tool to support clinicians, patients, and caregivers in decision‐making. The recommendations take into consideration the severity of both articular and nonarticular manifestations as well as patient quality of life. Although evidence is generally low quality and many recommendations are conditional, the inclusion of caregivers and patients in the decision‐making process strengthens the relevance and applicability of the guideline. It is important to remember that these are recommendations. Clinical decisions, as always, should be made by the treating clinician and patient/caregiver. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This article is published simultaneously in Supported by the American College of Rheumatology. Dr. Horton's work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH (grant K23‐AR‐070286). Dr. Ombrello's work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH (grant AR‐041198). Arthritis & Rheumatology . https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Facr.24853&file=acr.24853‐sup‐0001‐Disclosureform.pdf Author disclosures are available at ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Study conception and design. Onel, Horton, Lovell, Shenoi, Cuello, Lee, Murphy, Barbar-Smiley, Edelheit, Sullivan, Turner. Analysis and interpretation of data. Onel, Horton, Lovell, Shenoi, Cuello, Angeles-Han, Becker, Cron, Feldman, Ferguson, Gewanter, Guzman, Kimura, Nigrovic, Ombrello, Rabinovich, Tesher, Twilt, Klein-Gitelman, Cooper, Edelheit, Gillispie-Taylor, Mannion, Sullivan, Szymanski, Trachtman, Turgunbaev, Veiga, Reston. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published. Dr. Onel had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Acquisition of data. Onel, Horton, Lovell, Shenoi, Kimura, Lee, Murphy, Nigrovic, Ombrello, Rabinovich, Twilt, Barbar-Smiley, Cooper, Edelheit, Gillispie-Taylor, Hays, Mannion, Peterson, Flanagan, Saad, Sullivan, Szymanski, Trachtman, Reston. |
ISSN: | 2151-464X 2151-4658 2151-4658 |
DOI: | 10.1002/acr.24853 |