Building more accurate decision trees with the additive tree
The expansion of machine learning to high-stakes application domains such as medicine, finance, and criminal justice, where making informed decisions requires clear understanding of the model, has increased the interest in interpretable machine learning. The widely used Classification and Regression...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 40; pp. 19887 - 19893 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
01.10.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1816748116 |
Cover
Summary: | The expansion of machine learning to high-stakes application domains such as medicine, finance, and criminal justice, where making informed decisions requires clear understanding of the model, has increased the interest in interpretable machine learning. The widely used Classification and Regression Trees (CART) have played a major role in health sciences, due to their simple and intuitive explanation of predictions. Ensemble methods like gradient boosting can improve the accuracy of decision trees, but at the expense of the interpretability of the generated model. Additive models, such as those produced by gradient boosting, and full interaction models, such as CART, have been investigated largely in isolation. We show that these models exist along a spectrum, revealing previously unseen connections between these approaches. This paper introduces a rigorous formalization for the additive tree, an empirically validated learning technique for creating a single decision tree, and shows that this method can produce models equivalent to CART or gradient boosted stumps at the extremes by varying a single parameter. Although the additive tree is designed primarily to provide both the model interpretability and predictive performance needed for high-stakes applications like medicine, it also can produce decision trees represented by hybrid models between CART and boosted stumps that can outperform either of these approaches. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 1J.M.L. and E.D.G. contributed equally to this work. Contributed by Jerome H. Friedman, August 8, 2019 (sent for review October 10, 2018; reviewed by Adele Cutler and Giles Hooker) Reviewers: A.C., Utah State University; and G.H., Cornell University. Author contributions: J.M.L., E.D.G., L.H.U., E.E., E.S.D., C.B.S., J.H.F., T.D.S., and G.V. designed research; J.M.L., E.D.G., and G.V. performed research; J.M.L., E.D.G., L.H.U., E.E., S.T.J., J.H.F., T.D.S., and G.V. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.M.L., E.D.G., L.H.U., E.E., E.S.D., S.T.J., C.B.S., T.D.S., and G.V. analyzed data; and J.M.L., E.D.G., L.H.U., E.E., E.S.D., S.T.J., C.B.S., J.H.F., T.D.S., and G.V. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1816748116 |