Cellular normoxic biophysical markers of hydroxyurea treatment in sickle cell disease
Hydroxyurea (HU) has been used clinically to reduce the frequency of painful crisis and the need for blood transfusion in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients. However, the mechanisms underlying such beneficial effects of HU treatment are still not fully understood. Studies have indicated a weak corre...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 34; pp. 9527 - 9532 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
23.08.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1610435113 |
Cover
Summary: | Hydroxyurea (HU) has been used clinically to reduce the frequency of painful crisis and the need for blood transfusion in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients. However, the mechanisms underlying such beneficial effects of HU treatment are still not fully understood. Studies have indicated a weak correlation between clinical outcome and molecular markers, and the scientific quest to develop companion biophysical markers have mostly targeted studies of blood properties under hypoxia. Using a common-path interferometric technique, we measure biomechanical and morphological properties of individual red blood cells in SCD patients as a function of cell density, and investigate the correlation of these biophysical properties with drug intake as well as other clinically measured parameters. Our results show that patient-specific HU effects on the cellular biophysical properties are detectable at normoxia, and that these properties are strongly correlated with the clinically measured mean cellular volume rather than fetal hemoglobin level. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Contributed by Subra Suresh, June 29, 2016 (sent for review May 21, 2016; reviewed by Joseph DeSimone and Guruswami Ravichandran) Reviewers: J.D., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and G.R., California Institute of Technology. Author contributions: P.H., S.Z.A., Y.P., J.M.H., G.J.K., S.S., M.D., Z.Y., and P.T.C.S. designed research; P.H., S.Z.A., E.D., D.P.P., and Y.C. performed research; P.H., S.Z.A., E.D., D.P.P., Y.C., Y.P., J.M.H., G.J.K., S.S., M.D., Z.Y., and P.T.C.S. analyzed data; and P.H., S.Z.A., G.J.K., S.S., M.D., Z.Y., and P.T.C.S. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1610435113 |