Morphological variability in unrepaired bilateral clefts with and without cleft palate evaluated with geometric morphometrics

In subjects with orofacial clefts, there is an unresolved controversy on the effect of congenital maxillary growth deficiency vs. the effect of surgical intervention on the outcome of treatment. Intrinsic growth impairment in subjects with orofacial clefts can be studied by comparing facial morpholo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of anatomy Vol. 236; no. 3; pp. 425 - 433
Main Authors Latif, Abdul, Kuijpers, Mette A. R., Rachwalski, Martin, Latief, Benny S., Kuijpers‐Jagtman, Anne Marie, Fudalej, Piotr S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-8782
1469-7580
1469-7580
DOI10.1111/joa.13118

Cover

More Information
Summary:In subjects with orofacial clefts, there is an unresolved controversy on the effect of congenital maxillary growth deficiency vs. the effect of surgical intervention on the outcome of treatment. Intrinsic growth impairment in subjects with orofacial clefts can be studied by comparing facial morphology of subjects with untreated cleft and unaffected individuals of the same ethnic background. Bilateral cleft lip and palate is the most severe and least prevalent form of the orofacial cleft. The aim of this study was to compare facial morphology in subjects with unrepaired complete bilateral clefts and unaffected controls using geometric morphometrics. Lateral cephalograms of 39 Indonesian subjects with unrepaired bilateral complete cleft lip and alveolus (mean age: 24 years), or unrepaired bilateral complete cleft lip, alveolus, and palate (mean age: 20.6 years) and 50 age and ethnically matched controls without a cleft (25 males, 25 females, mean age: 21.2 years) were digitized and traced and shape variability was explored using principal component analysis, while differences between groups and genders were evaluated with canonical variate analysis. Individuals with clefts had a more pronounced premaxilla than controls. Principal component analysis showed that facial variation in subjects with clefts occurred in the anteroposterior direction, whereas in controls it was mostly in the vertical direction. Regression analysis with group, sex, and age as covariates and principal components from 1 to 6 as dependent variables demonstrated a very limited effect of the covariates on the facial shape variability (only 11.6% of the variability was explained by the model). Differences between cleft and non‐cleft subjects in the direction of facial variability suggest that individuals with bilateral clefts can have an intrinsic growth impairment affecting facial morphology later in life. Facial variation in subjects with clefts occurred in the antero‐posterior direction, whereas in controls it was mostly in the vertical direction. This suggests that individuals with bilateral clefts can have an intrinsic growth impairment affecting facial morphology later in life.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-8782
1469-7580
1469-7580
DOI:10.1111/joa.13118