Cine gastric MRI reveals altered Gut–Brain Axis in Functional Dyspepsia: gastric motility is linked with brainstem‐cortical fMRI connectivity
Background Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a disorder of gut–brain interaction, and its putative pathophysiology involves dysregulation of gastric motility and central processing of gastric afference. The vagus nerve modulates gastric peristalsis and carries afferent sensory information to brainstem nu...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Neurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 34; no. 10; pp. e14396 - n/a | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        England
          Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
    
        01.10.2022
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 1350-1925 1365-2982 1365-2982  | 
| DOI | 10.1111/nmo.14396 | 
Cover
| Summary: | Background
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a disorder of gut–brain interaction, and its putative pathophysiology involves dysregulation of gastric motility and central processing of gastric afference. The vagus nerve modulates gastric peristalsis and carries afferent sensory information to brainstem nuclei, specifically the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS). Here, we combine MRI assessment of gastric kinematics with measures of NTS functional connectivity to the brain in patients with FD and healthy controls (HC), in order to elucidate how gut–brain axis communication is associated with FD pathophysiology.
Methods
Functional dyspepsia and HC subjects experienced serial gastric MRI and brain fMRI following ingestion of a food‐based contrast meal. Gastric function indices estimated from 4D cine MRI data were compared between FD and HC groups using repeated measure ANOVA models, controlling for ingested volume. Brain connectivity of the NTS was contrasted between groups and associated with gastric function indices.
Key Results
Propagation velocity of antral peristalsis was significantly lower in FD compared to HC. The brain network defined by NTS connectivity loaded most strongly onto the Default Mode Network, and more strongly onto the Frontoparietal Network in FD. FD also demonstrated higher NTS connectivity to insula, anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices, and pre‐supplementary motor area. NTS connectivity was linked to propagation velocity in HC, but not FD, whereas peristalsis frequency was linked with NTS connectivity in patients with FD.
Conclusions & Inferences
Our multi‐modal MRI approach revealed lower peristaltic propagation velocity linked to altered brainstem‐cortical functional connectivity in patients suffering from FD suggesting specific plasticity in gut–brain communication.
Our multi‐modal MRI approach revealed lower peristaltic propagation velocity linked to altered brainstem‐cortical functional connectivity in patients suffering from FD suggesting specific plasticity in gut‐brain communication. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | Funding information The present work was supported by the following organizations: US National Instituted of Health (NIH), Office Of The Director (OT2‐OD023867); Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies (P41‐EB015896); National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (P01‐AT006663); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21‐DK116029, U01DK112193); NIDDK Diabetic Complications Consortium (DK076169, DK115255). This work also involved the use of instrumentation supported by the NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant Program and/or High‐End Instrumentation Grant Program; specifically, Grant no. S1‐0RR023043 Roberta Sclocco, Harrison Fisher, Braden Kuo and Vitaly Napadow equal contribution ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 equal contribution Author Contributions: R. Sclocco: study concept and design; acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. H. Fisher: acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; statistical analysis. R. Staley, K. Han, A. Mendez, A. Bolender: acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data. J. Coll-Font, N. Kettner: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. C. Nguyen, B. Kuo, V. Napadow: study concept and design; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; obtained funding; study supervision.  | 
| ISSN: | 1350-1925 1365-2982 1365-2982  | 
| DOI: | 10.1111/nmo.14396 |