The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome
Background Few observations exist with respect to the pro‐coagulant profile of patients with COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Reports of thromboembolic complications are scarce but suggestive for a clinical relevance of the problem. Objectives Prospective observational study aime...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis Vol. 18; no. 7; pp. 1747 - 1751 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Limited
01.07.2020
International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1538-7933 1538-7836 1538-7836 |
DOI | 10.1111/jth.14854 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
Few observations exist with respect to the pro‐coagulant profile of patients with COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Reports of thromboembolic complications are scarce but suggestive for a clinical relevance of the problem.
Objectives
Prospective observational study aimed to characterize the coagulation profile of COVID‐19 ARDS patients with standard and viscoelastic coagulation tests and to evaluate their changes after establishment of an aggressive thromboprophylaxis.
Methods
Sixteen patients with COVID‐19 ARDS received a complete coagulation profile at the admission in the intensive care unit. Ten patients were followed in the subsequent 7 days, after increasing the dose of low molecular weight heparin, antithrombin levels correction, and clopidogrel in selected cases.
Results
At baseline, the patients showed a pro‐coagulant profile characterized by an increased clot strength (CS, median 55 hPa, 95% interquartile range 35‐63), platelet contribution to CS (PCS, 43 hPa; interquartile range 24‐45), fibrinogen contribution to CS (FCS, 12 hPa; interquartile range 6‐13.5) elevated D‐dimer levels (5.5 μg/mL, interquartile range 2.5‐6.5), and hyperfibrinogenemia (794 mg/dL, interquartile range 583‐933). Fibrinogen levels were associated (R2 = .506, P = .003) with interleukin‐6 values. After increasing the thromboprophylaxis, there was a significant (P = .001) time‐related decrease of fibrinogen levels, D‐dimers (P = .017), CS (P = .013), PCS (P = .035), and FCS (P = .038).
Conclusion
The pro‐coagulant pattern of these patients may justify the clinical reports of thromboembolic complications (pulmonary embolism) during the course of the disease. Further studies are needed to assess the best prophylaxis and treatment of this condition. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information This study was funded by the IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, a Clinical Research Hospital recognized and partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 1538-7933 1538-7836 1538-7836 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jth.14854 |