Classification of moroccan olive cultivars by linear discriminant analysis applied to ATR-FTIR spectra of endocarps

Summary The potential of FTIR combined with chemometrics was studied to classify five Moroccan varieties of olives by analysis on the endocarps. Attenuated total reflectance (ATR) enabled the samples to be examined directly in the solid state. The spectral data were subjected to a preliminary deriva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of food science & technology Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 1286 - 1292
Main Authors De Luca, Michele, Terouzi, Wafa, Kzaiber, Fouzia, Ioele, Giuseppina, Oussama, Abdelkhalek, Ragno, Gaetano
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2012
Wiley-Blackwell
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0950-5423
1365-2621
DOI10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.02972.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Summary The potential of FTIR combined with chemometrics was studied to classify five Moroccan varieties of olives by analysis on the endocarps. Attenuated total reflectance (ATR) enabled the samples to be examined directly in the solid state. The spectral data were subjected to a preliminary derivative elaboration based on the Norris gap algorithm to reduce the noise and extract larger analytical information. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was adopted as classification method, and Principle component analysis (PCA) was employed to compress the original data set into a reduced new set of variables before LDA. The calibration set was built by using the IR data from seventy‐five samples scanned in reflectance mode, and the ranges 3000–2400 and 2300–600 cm−1 were selected because furnishing the most useful analytical information. PCA allowed clustering the samples in five classes by using the first two principal components with an explained variance of 98.16%. Application of LDA on an external test set of twenty‐five samples enabled to classify them into five variety groups with a correct classification of 92.0%.
Bibliography:istex:63BC207694C76B5F779EAC19F4563D7C6C891AB6
ArticleID:IJFS2972
ark:/67375/WNG-RDH43M93-S
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0950-5423
1365-2621
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.02972.x