Lifespan age differences in working memory: A two-component framework

We suggest that working memory (WM) performance can be conceptualized as the interplay of low-level feature binding processes and top-down control, relating to posterior and frontal brain regions and their interaction in a distributed neural network. We propose that due to age-differential trajector...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews Vol. 36; no. 9; pp. 2007 - 2033
Main Authors Sander, Myriam C., Lindenberger, Ulman, Werkle-Bergner, Markus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier 01.10.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0149-7634
1873-7528
1873-7528
DOI10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.06.004

Cover

More Information
Summary:We suggest that working memory (WM) performance can be conceptualized as the interplay of low-level feature binding processes and top-down control, relating to posterior and frontal brain regions and their interaction in a distributed neural network. We propose that due to age-differential trajectories of posterior and frontal brain regions top-down control processes are not fully mature until young adulthood and show marked decline with advancing age, whereas binding processes are relatively mature in children, but show senescent decline in older adults. A review of the literature spanning from middle childhood to old age shows that binding and top-down control processes undergo profound changes across the lifespan. We illustrate commonalities and dissimilarities between children, younger adults, and older adults reflecting the change in the two components' relative contribution to visual WM performance across the lifespan using results from our own lab. We conclude that an integrated account of visual WM lifespan changes combining research from behavioral neuroscience and cognitive psychology of child development as well as aging research opens avenues to advance our understanding of cognition in general.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0149-7634
1873-7528
1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.06.004