A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 726432
• Main Authors: Panitz, Christian, Endres, Dominik, Buchholz, Merle, Khosrowtaj, Zahra, Sperl, Matthias F. J., Mueller, Erik M., Schubö, Anna, Schütz, Alexander C., Teige-Mocigemba, Sarah, Pinquart, Martin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 11.11.2021
• Subjects: expectation change; expectation update; expectation violation; expectations; prediction error; Psychology; ViolEx model
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726432

Expectations are probabilistic beliefs about the future that shape and influence our perception, affect, cognition, and behavior in many contexts. This makes expectations a highly relevant concept across basic and applied psychological disciplines. When expectations are confirmed or violated, individuals can respond by either updating or maintaining their prior expectations in light of the new evidence. Moreover, proactive and reactive behavior can change the probability with which individuals encounter expectation confirmations or violations. The investigation of predictors and mechanisms underlying expectation update and maintenance has been approached from many research perspectives. However, in many instances there has been little exchange between different research fields. To further advance research on expectations and expectation violations, collaborative efforts across different disciplines in psychology, cognitive (neuro)science, and other life sciences are warranted. For fostering and facilitating such efforts, we introduce the ViolEx 2.0 model, a revised framework for interdisciplinary research on cognitive and behavioral mechanisms of expectation update and maintenance in the context of expectation violations. To support different goals and stages in interdisciplinary exchange, the ViolEx 2.0 model features three model levels with varying degrees of specificity in order to address questions about the research synopsis, central concepts, or functional processes and relationships, respectively. The framework can be applied to different research fields and has high potential for guiding collaborative research efforts in expectation research.