Acetylcholine and noradrenaline differentially regulate hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory

Abstract Severe loss of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain nuclei and of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus are almost invariant histopathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. However, the role of these transmitter systems in the spectrum of cognitive dysfunctions typical of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain communications Vol. 5; no. 1; p. fcac338
Main Authors de Leo, Gioacchino, Gulino, Rosario, Coradazzi, Marino, Leanza, Giampiero
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published US Oxford University Press 2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2632-1297
2632-1297
DOI10.1093/braincomms/fcac338

Cover

More Information
Summary:Abstract Severe loss of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain nuclei and of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus are almost invariant histopathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. However, the role of these transmitter systems in the spectrum of cognitive dysfunctions typical of the disease is still unclear, nor is it yet fully known whether do these systems interact and how. Selective ablation of either neuronal population, or both of them combined, were produced in developing animals to investigate their respective and/or concurrent contribution to spatial learning and memory, known to be severely affected in Alzheimer’s disease. Single or double lesions were created in 4–8 days old rats by bilateral intraventricular infusion of two selective immunotoxins. At about 16 weeks of age, the animals underwent behavioural tests specifically designed to evaluate reference and working memory abilities, and their brains were later processed for quantitative morphological analyses. Animals with lesion to either system alone showed no significant reference memory deficits which, by contrast, were evident in the double-lesioned subjects. These animals could not adopt an efficient search strategy on a given testing day and were unable to transfer all relevant information to the next day, suggesting deficits in acquisition, storage and/or recall. Only animals with single noradrenergic or double lesions exhibited impaired working memory. Interestingly, ablation of cholinergic afferents to the hippocampus stimulated a robust ingrowth of thick fibres from the superior cervical ganglion which, however, did not appear to have contributed to the observed cognitive performance. Ascending cholinergic and noradrenergic afferents to the hippocampus and neocortex appear to be primarily involved in the regulation of different cognitive domains, but they may functionally interact, mainly at hippocampal level, for sustaining normal learning and memory. Moreover, these transmitter systems are likely to compensate for each other, but apparently not via ingrowing sympathetic fibres. Ascending cholinergic and noradrenergic inputs regulate cognitive abilities and their dysfunction is a major hallmark in pathologies with memory loss. Here, de Leo et al. report that these inputs converge to hippocampus to regulate different cognitive domains but they functionally interact and can efficiently compensate for each other when disrupted. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Gioacchino de Leo and Rosario Gulino contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:2632-1297
2632-1297
DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcac338