Design and In Silico Evaluation of an Exercise Decision Support System Using Digital Twin Models

• Published in: Journal of diabetes science and technology Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 324 - 334
• Main Authors: Young, Gavin, Dodier, Robert, Youssef, Joseph El, Castle, Jessica R., Wilson, Leah, Riddell, Michael C., Jacobs, Peter G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Awareness; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - therapy; Exercise; Exercise Therapy; Glucose; Humans; Special Section: Algorithms for Predicting Complications of Diabetes; exercise; type 1 diabetes; decision support; automated insulin delivery
• ISSN: 1932-2968; 1932-3107; 1932-3107
• DOI: 10.1177/19322968231223217

Background: Managing glucose levels during exercise is challenging for individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) since multiple factors including activity type, duration, intensity and other factors must be considered. Current decision support tools lack personalized recommendations and fail to distinguish between aerobic and resistance exercise. We propose an exercise-aware decision support system (exDSS) that uses digital twins to deliver personalized recommendations to help people with T1D maintain safe glucose levels (70-180 mg/dL) and avoid low glucose (<70 mg/dL) during and after exercise. Methods: We evaluated exDSS using various exercise and meal scenarios recorded from a large, free-living study of aerobic and resistance exercise. The model inputs were heart rate, insulin, and meal data. Glucose responses were simulated during and after 30-minute exercise sessions (676 aerobic, 631 resistance) from 247 participants. Glucose outcomes were compared when participants followed exDSS recommendations, clinical guidelines, or did not modify behavior (no intervention). Results: exDSS significantly improved mean time in range for aerobic (80.2% to 92.3%, P < .0001) and resistance (72.3% to 87.3%, P < .0001) exercises compared with no intervention, and versus clinical guidelines (aerobic: 82.2%, P < .0001; resistance: 80.3%, P < .0001). exDSS reduced time spent in low glucose for both exercise types compared with no intervention (aerobic: 15.1% to 5.1%, P < .0001; resistance: 18.2% to 6.6%, P < .0001) and was comparable with following clinical guidelines (aerobic: 4.5%, resistance: 8.1%, P = N.S.). Conclusions: The exDSS tool significantly improved glucose outcomes during and after exercise versus following clinical guidelines and no intervention providing motivation for clinical evaluation of the exDSS system.