The impact of HER2-Low expression in salivary duct carcinoma: Clinicopathologic features, survival outcomes, and association with androgen receptor-targeted therapy
•Of 526 salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) patients, 184 (35%) had HER2-low tumors.•Sex, M, histological origin, Ki67 and p53 differed between HER2-low and positive.•No differences in RFS or OS were observed for HER2 status in curative treatment cohort.•In AR-targeted therapy cohort, HER2-low had signifi...
Saved in:
Published in | Oral oncology Vol. 165; p. 107280 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.06.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1368-8375 1879-0593 1879-0593 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107280 |
Cover
Summary: | •Of 526 salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) patients, 184 (35%) had HER2-low tumors.•Sex, M, histological origin, Ki67 and p53 differed between HER2-low and positive.•No differences in RFS or OS were observed for HER2 status in curative treatment cohort.•In AR-targeted therapy cohort, HER2-low had significantly better ORR and PFS than HER2-positive.•HER2-low can serve as a novel biomarker in patients with SDC.
Recent advances in systemic therapy for salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) have been driven by the development of HER2- and androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies. Trastuzumab deruxtecan has proven effective not only in HER2-positive but also HER2-low breast and gastro-esophageal cancers. However, the significance of HER2-low expression in SDC remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics, prognostic implications, and impact on efficacy to AR-targeted therapy in HER2-low SDC.
This was a multi-center, observational study. HER2 status was reclassified as follows: HER2-positive (IHC3+ or 2+/ISH+ ), HER2-low (IHC1+ or 2+/ISH-), and HER2-zero (IHC0). The subjects were compared in three groups: total population, curative treatment cohort, and AR-targeted therapy cohort.
The total population consisted of 526 patients, of whom, 271 (52 %), 184 (35 %), and 71 (13 %) had HER2-positive, -low, and -zero tumors, respectively. Sex, M category, histological origin, Ki67, and p53 expression differed significantly between the HER2-low and HER2-positive cases. No differences in relapse-free or overall survival were observed for HER2 status in the curative treatment cohort; however, in the AR-targeted therapy cohort, the HER2-low group had significantly better response rates (41.6 % vs. 18.9 %, Odds ratio = 0.30, P = 0.012) and longer median progression-free survival (6.9 vs. 4.2 months, Hazard ratio = 1.61, P = 0.029) than those of the HER2-positive group.
HER2-low showed different clinicopathologic features from HER2-positive cases, with no prognostic differences observed in patients who underwent curative treatment. Still, HER2-low may be associated with the efficacy of AR-targeted therapy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1368-8375 1879-0593 1879-0593 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107280 |