Comparison of two chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy measurement approaches in children

Purpose Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of cancer treatment in children; however, measurement of CIPN has been hampered by limitations in available tools, which may impact prevalence estimates. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative ability of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSupportive care in cancer Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 359 - 366
Main Authors Gilchrist, L. S., Marais, L., Tanner, L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.02.2014
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
DOI10.1007/s00520-013-1981-6

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of cancer treatment in children; however, measurement of CIPN has been hampered by limitations in available tools, which may impact prevalence estimates. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative ability of the Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) rating process to detect sensory and motor neuropathy as compared to administration of the pediatric modified Total Neuropathy Score (peds-mTNS). Methods The ped-mTNS was administered to 60 children/adolescents ages 5–18 undergoing treatment for acute lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma, or non-CNS solid tumors. CTCAE v3.0 scores for the same time point were abstracted from the medical record by a separate trained rater. Comparisons were made between scores using descriptive statistics, correlations, and specificity and sensitivity calculations. Results The median ped-mTNS score was 9 (32 possible), while the median sensory and motor CTCAE ratings were 0 and 2, respectively (4 and 5 possible, respectively). There was no correlation between ped-mTNS and combined sensory and motor CTCAE scores. The only ped-mTNS item with significant correlation to CTCAE scoring was strength testing. Medical record abstraction of CTCAE scores failed to identify sensory neuropathy in 40 % and significant motor neuropathy (manual muscle test grade 3 or worse) in 15 % of subjects. Conclusions Prospective measures of CIPN using the ped-mTNS identified a far greater proportion of subjects with peripheral neurotoxicity as compared to CTCAE v3.0 sensory and motor neuropathy ratings, and thus we recommend the use of a specific measure of CIPN such as the ped-mTNS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-013-1981-6