Deep learning-driven brain tumor classification and segmentation using non-contrast MRI

This study aims to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of MRI-based brain tumor diagnosis by leveraging deep learning (DL) techniques applied to multichannel MRI inputs. MRI data were collected from 203 subjects, including 100 normal cases and 103 cases with 13 distinct brain tumor types. Non-contra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 27831 - 24
Main Authors Lu, Nan-Han, Huang, Yung-Hui, Liu, Kuo-Ying, Chen, Tai-Been
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 30.07.2025
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI10.1038/s41598-025-13591-2

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study aims to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of MRI-based brain tumor diagnosis by leveraging deep learning (DL) techniques applied to multichannel MRI inputs. MRI data were collected from 203 subjects, including 100 normal cases and 103 cases with 13 distinct brain tumor types. Non-contrast T1-weighted (T1w) and T2-weighted (T2w) images were combined with their average to form RGB three-channel inputs, enriching the representation for model training. Several convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were evaluated for tumor classification, while fully convolutional networks (FCNs) were employed for tumor segmentation. Standard preprocessing, normalization, and training procedures were rigorously followed. The RGB fusion of T1w, T2w, and their average significantly enhanced model performance. The classification task achieved a top accuracy of 98.3% using the Darknet53 model, and segmentation attained a mean Dice score of 0.937 with ResNet50. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of multichannel input fusion and model selection in improving brain tumor analysis. While not yet integrated into clinical workflows, this approach holds promise for future development of DL-assisted decision-support tools in radiological practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-13591-2