Continuum damage models with non-conventional finite element formulations

In recent years, some research effort has been devoted to the development of non-conventional finite element models for the analysis of concrete structures. These models use continuum damage mechanics to represent the physically non-linear behavior of this quasi-brittle material. Two alternative app...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of non-linear mechanics Vol. 45; no. 2; pp. 83 - 99
Main Authors Silva, C.M., Castro, L.M.S.S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0020-7462
1878-5638
1878-5638
DOI10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.09.005

Cover

More Information
Summary:In recent years, some research effort has been devoted to the development of non-conventional finite element models for the analysis of concrete structures. These models use continuum damage mechanics to represent the physically non-linear behavior of this quasi-brittle material. Two alternative approaches proved to be robust and computationally competitive when compared with the classical displacement finite element implementations. The first corresponds to the hybrid–mixed stress model where both the effective stress and the displacement fields are independently modeled in the domain of each finite element and the displacements are approximated along the static boundary, which is considered to include the inter-element edges. The second approach corresponds to a hybrid–displacement model. In this case, the displacements in the domain of each element and the tractions along the kinematic boundary are independently approximated. Since it is a displacement model, the inter-element boundaries are now included in the kinematic boundary. In both models, complete sets of orthonormal Legendre polynomials are used to define all approximations required, so very effective p-refinement procedures can be implemented. This paper illustrates the numerical performance of these two alternative approaches and compares their efficiency and accuracy with the classical finite element models. For this purpose, a set of numerical tests is presented and discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-7462
1878-5638
1878-5638
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.09.005