Uncertainty Analysis of Life Cycle Energy Assessment in Early Stages of Design

•Uncertain parameters have a high influence on the lifecycle-based energy efficiency.•Uncertainty analysis must be performed to identify the impact of the uncertainties.•Results allow the designer to prioritize decisions to decrease uncertainty.•Enable lifecycle-based energy efficiency already at be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy and buildings Vol. 208; p. 109635
Main Authors Harter, Hannes, Singh, Manav Mahan, Schneider-Marin, Patricia, Lang, Werner, Geyer, Philipp
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Elsevier B.V 01.02.2020
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0378-7788
1872-6178
1872-6178
DOI10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109635

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Uncertain parameters have a high influence on the lifecycle-based energy efficiency.•Uncertainty analysis must be performed to identify the impact of the uncertainties.•Results allow the designer to prioritize decisions to decrease uncertainty.•Enable lifecycle-based energy efficiency already at beginning of construction projects. During building design and especially in early stages, important decisions influencing the lifecycle-based energy demand of buildings are made. Life Cycle Energy Assessment (LCEA) is used to evaluate this energy demand already in early stages of design. However, at that point, the building design and the related information can quickly change and are subject to potentially large uncertainty. This uncertainty in building information influences the LCEA and therefore decisions taken by the designer. Due to the uncertainty, it is difficult to distinguish between the performance of different design variants to decide for the best option. This study presents a method to perform LCEA and to assess and consequently strategically reduce the influence of uncertainties in buildings’ information on the LCEA in early design stages. Uncertainty analysis is used to assess the influence of uncertainty on LCEA and to prioritize decisions to reduce uncertainty. The method is embedded in a multi-Level of Development (LOD) modelling approach covering the development of the building during the early stages of design. The method is applied to seven different building shapes as a proof of concept. It is concluded that the method renders valid results to assess the project-specific uncertainty in LCEA results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0378-7788
1872-6178
1872-6178
DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109635