Comparative study of total lipids in beef using chlorinated solvent and low-toxicity solvent methods
Nine extraction methods (three using chlorinated and six nonchlorinated solvents) were compared for determining lipids in samples of low‐(<5%) and high‐fat (>20%) ground beef. The nine methods investigated were: Folch, Lees, and Sloane Stanley (FLS); Bligh and Dyer (BD); Bligh and Dyer modifie...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society Vol. 82; no. 6; pp. 393 - 397 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer‐Verlag
01.06.2005
Springer Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0003-021X 1558-9331 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11746-005-1083-4 |
Cover
Summary: | Nine extraction methods (three using chlorinated and six nonchlorinated solvents) were compared for determining lipids in samples of low‐(<5%) and high‐fat (>20%) ground beef. The nine methods investigated were: Folch, Lees, and Sloane Stanley (FLS); Bligh and Dyer (BD); Bligh and Dyer modified by Undeland, Harrod, and Lingnert (BDU); Bligh and Dyer modified by Smedes (BDS); Hara and Radin (HR); Schmid, Bondzynski, and Ratzalaff (SBR); Roese‐Gottlieb (RG); Burton, Webb, and Ingold (BWI); and Soxhlet (SE). The BDS and HR methods do not include solvents such as chloroform and methanol and can be recommended for meat samples that have both low and high fat content. If the use of organic solvents is not critical, the FLS and the BD extraction methods yield the highest results, but the FLS is more expensive owing to the high amount of solvent required. Without considering the toxicity of the solvents, the three BD extraction methods provided the best yields. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-021X 1558-9331 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11746-005-1083-4 |