Isoeugenol is an important contact allergen: can it be safely replaced with isoeugenyl acetate?

The prevalence of contact allergy to the fragrance mix in individuals with eczema is up to 10%. Within the mix, isoeugenol (CAS 97–54–1) is an important individual allergen. Until May 1998, the IFRA (International Fragrance Assocation) guidelines suggested that isoeugenol could safely be used at a l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContact dermatitis Vol. 41; no. 5; pp. 272 - 275
Main Authors White, I. R., Johansen, J. D., Arnau, E. Giménez, Lepoittevin, J.-P., Rastogi, S., Bruze, M., Andersen, K. E., Frosch, P. J., Goossens, A., Menné, T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.1999
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0105-1873
1600-0536
DOI10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06160.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:The prevalence of contact allergy to the fragrance mix in individuals with eczema is up to 10%. Within the mix, isoeugenol (CAS 97–54–1) is an important individual allergen. Until May 1998, the IFRA (International Fragrance Assocation) guidelines suggested that isoeugenol could safely be used at a level of 0.2% in consumer products. In May 1998, IFRA recommended that isoeugenol should not be used at a level that exceeds 0.02% in consumer products, but did not provide guidance on allergen substitution. An alternative to isoeugenol, based on aroma and absence of guide‐lines on use, is isoeugenyl acetate (CAS 93–29–8). 155 consecutive subjects were patch tested to isoeugenyl acetate (1.2%, 0.4%, 0.13% eth.) and isoeugenol 1% pet. 6 (3.9%) had an allergic reaction to 1.2% isoeugenyl acetate at D4. The reactions to the other 2 dilutions tended to be graded. 8 individuals had at least a palpable erythema by D4 to isoeugenol 1% pet. The majority of individuals allergic to isoeugenol were also intolerant of isoeugenyl acetate. Effective labelling of fragrance substances on consumer products will facilitate monitoring of exposure.
Bibliography:ArticleID:COD272
ark:/67375/WNG-0ZZ66HMK-D
istex:F4572F76F34018CC42BAE375540174F8273D6B90
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0105-1873
1600-0536
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06160.x