Critical reappraisal confirms that Mitofusin 2 is an endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria tether
The discovery of the multiple roles of mitochondria–endoplasmic reticulum (ER) juxtaposition in cell biology often relied upon the exploitation of Mitofusin (Mfn) 2 as an ER–mitochondria tether. However, this established Mfn2 function was recently questioned, calling for a critical re-evaluation of...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 40; pp. 11249 - 11254 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
04.10.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1606786113 |
Cover
Summary: | The discovery of the multiple roles of mitochondria–endoplasmic reticulum (ER) juxtaposition in cell biology often relied upon the exploitation of Mitofusin (Mfn) 2 as an ER–mitochondria tether. However, this established Mfn2 function was recently questioned, calling for a critical re-evaluation of Mfn2’s role in ER–mitochondria cross-talk. Electron microscopy and fluorescence-based probes of organelle proximity confirmed that ER–mitochondria juxtaposition was reduced by constitutive or acute Mfn2 deletion. Functionally, mitochondrial uptake of Ca2+ released from the ER was reduced following acute Mfn2 ablation, as well as in Mfn2
−/− cells overexpressing the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake rate and extent were normal in isolated Mfn2
−/− liver mitochondria, consistent with the finding that acute or chronic Mfn2 ablation or overexpression did not alter mitochondrial calcium uniporter complex component levels. Hence, Mfn2 stands as a bona fide ER–mitochondria tether whose ablation decreases interorganellar juxtaposition and communication. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author contributions: D.N., D.D.S., G.W.D., and L.S. designed research; D.N., M.Z., M.G., T.V., F.G., S.L., A.S., M.S., S.H., G.W.D., and L.S. performed research; M.G., M.I.H.-A., and A.Z. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.N., M.Z., M.G., T.V., F.G., S.L., A.S., M.S., S.H., and L.S. analyzed data; and D.N., G.W.D., and L.S. wrote the paper. Edited by Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, National Institutes of Science, Bethesda, MD, and approved August 17, 2016 (received for review April 28, 2016) |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1606786113 |