Reclassification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia According to the 2016 WHO Classification
We reviewed our leukemia database to reclassify 610 patients previously diagnosed as having acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to the updated 2016 WHO classification. Nine patients were categorized as having myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloid neoplasms with germline predisposition. AML with re...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of laboratory medicine Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 311 - 316 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
01.05.2019
대한진단검사의학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2234-3806 2234-3814 2234-3814 |
DOI | 10.3343/alm.2019.39.3.311 |
Cover
Summary: | We reviewed our leukemia database to reclassify 610 patients previously diagnosed as having acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to the updated 2016 WHO classification. Nine patients were categorized as having myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloid neoplasms with germline predisposition. AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities accounted for 57.4% (345/601) of the patients under the 2016 WHO classification. AML with mutated
was the most common form (16.5%), with the majority associated with monocytic differentiation (63.6%). AML with double
mutations accounted for 8.3% of these cases, and the majority were previously diagnosed as AML with/without maturation (78.0%). These newly classified mutations were mutually exclusive without overlapping with other forms of AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities. AML with mutated
and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes comprised the oldest patients, whereas AML with
included the youngest patients. The leukocyte count was highest in AML with mutated
, and the percentage of peripheral blood blasts was the highest in AML with double
mutations. Our results indicate that implementation of the 2016 WHO classification of AML would not pose major difficulties in clinical practice. Hematopathologists should review and prepare genetic tests for the new classification, according to their clinical laboratory conditions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 These authors contributed equally to this study. |
ISSN: | 2234-3806 2234-3814 2234-3814 |
DOI: | 10.3343/alm.2019.39.3.311 |