GP algorithm versus hybrid and mixed neural networks

• Published in: The European journal of finance Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 180 - 205
• Main Authors: Dunis, Christian L., Laws, Jason, Karathanasopoulos, Andreas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Routledge 01.03.2013; Taylor & Francis LLC
• Subjects: Algorithms; Averages; Comparative studies; Computational methods; Computer programmes; confirmation filters; Convergence; evolutionary algorithms; Family physicians; Financial institutions; Forecasting techniques; Genetic algorithms; genetic programming; HONNs; Indexes; leverage; Mathematical programming; Motivation; multi-layer perceptron networks; Neural networks; Programming; quantitative trading strategies; Recurrent; RNNs; Securities trading; Statistical models; system modelling; Time series; Greece
• ISSN: 1351-847X; 1466-4364
• DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2012.679740

In the current paper, we present an integrated genetic programming (GP) environment called java GP modelling. The java GP modelling environment is an implementation of the steady-state GP algorithm. This algorithm evolves tree-based structures that represent models of inputs and outputs. The motivation of this paper is to compare the GP algorithm with neural network (NN) architectures when applied to the task of forecasting and trading the ASE 20 Greek Index (using autoregressive terms as inputs). This is done by benchmarking the forecasting performance of the GP algorithm and six different autoregressive moving average model (ARMA) NN combination designs representing a Hybrid, Mixed Higher Order Neural Network (HONN), a Hybrid, Mixed Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), a Hybrid, Mixed classic Multilayer Perceptron with some traditional techniques, either statistical such as a an ARMA or technical such as a moving average convergence/divergence model, and a naïve trading strategy. More specifically, the trading performance of all models is investigated in a forecast and trading simulation on ASE 20 time-series closing prices over the period 2001-2008, using the last one and a half years for out-of-sample testing. We use the ASE 20 daily series as many financial institutions are ready to trade at this level, and it is therefore possible to leave orders with a bank for business to be transacted on that basis. As it turns out, the GP model does remarkably well and outperforms all other models in a simple trading simulation exercise. This is also the case when more sophisticated trading strategies using confirmation filters and leverage are applied, as the GP model still produces better results and outperforms all other NN and traditional statistical models in terms of annualized return.