The Interaction of Microplastics and Microbioplastics with Soil and a Comparison of Their Potential to Spread Pathogens

Microplastics contribute to various environmental issues and serve as carriers for a wide range of toxic compounds such as pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and metal ions. Consequently, there is a gradual shift towards replacing them with biodegradable plastics (bioplastics). However, biodegradable plas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied sciences Vol. 14; no. 11; p. 4643
Main Authors Trojan, Marek, Koutný, Marek, Brtnický, Martin, Holátko, Jiří, Zlámalová Gargošová, Helena, Fojt, Jakub, Procházková, Petra, Kalčíková, Gabriela, Kučerík, Jiří
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI10.3390/app14114643

Cover

More Information
Summary:Microplastics contribute to various environmental issues and serve as carriers for a wide range of toxic compounds such as pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and metal ions. Consequently, there is a gradual shift towards replacing them with biodegradable plastics (bioplastics). However, biodegradable plastics require specific conditions for complete biodegradation, and their biodeterioration often leads to the rapid production of smaller fragments, known as microbioplastics. In this review, we summarize selected issues related to the impact of plastic particles on soil properties and the soil microbiome. Findings from numerous studies indicate that both microplastics and microbioplastics induce adverse changes in soil microbiology, potentially increasing the abundance of soil-borne pathogens. Based on these observations, we argue that plastic particles could serve as carriers for colonies of soil-borne pathogens. Furthermore, the use of bioplastics may exacerbate this issue due to their easier and faster formation, increased support for biofilms, and more pronounced adverse effects on soil biota. However, further research is necessary to either substantiate or refute this perspective.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app14114643