Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer in Korea: An Evidence-Based Approach

Although gastric cancer is quite common in Korea, the treatment outcome is relatively favorable compared to those in western countries. However, there are currently no Korean multidisciplinary guidelines for gastric cancer. Experts from related societies developed guidelines de novo to meet Korean c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gastric cancer Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 87 - 104
Main Authors Lee, Jun Haeng, Kim, Jae G., Jung, Hye-Kyung, Kim, Jung Hoon, Jeong, Woo Kyoung, Jeon, Tae Joo, Kim, Joon Mee, Kim, Young Il, Ryu, Keun Won, Kong, Seong-Ho, Kim, Hyoung-Il, Jung, Hwoon-Yong, Kim, Yong Sik, Zang, Dae Young, Cho, Jae Yong, Park, Joon Oh, Lim, Do Hoon, Jung, Eun Sun, Ahn, Hyeong Sik, Kim, Hyun Jung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 01.06.2014
대한위암학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2093-582X
2093-5641
DOI10.5230/jgc.2014.14.2.87

Cover

More Information
Summary:Although gastric cancer is quite common in Korea, the treatment outcome is relatively favorable compared to those in western countries. However, there are currently no Korean multidisciplinary guidelines for gastric cancer. Experts from related societies developed guidelines de novo to meet Korean circumstances and requirements, including 23 recommendation statements for diagnosis (n=9) and treatment (n=14) based on relevant key questions. The quality of the evidence was rated according to the GRADE evidence evaluation framework: the evidence levels were based on a systematic review of the literature, and the recommendation grades were classified as either strong or weak. The applicability of the guidelines was considered to meet patients' view and preferences in the context of Korea. The topics of the guidelines cover diagnostic modalities (endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and radiologic diagnosis), treatment modalities (surgery, therapeutic endoscopy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), and pathologic evaluation. An external review of the guidelines was conducted during the finalization phase.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
http://pdf.medrang.co.kr/paper/pdf/Gasca/Gasca014-02-02.pdf
G704-SER000001500.2014.14.2.001
ISSN:2093-582X
2093-5641
DOI:10.5230/jgc.2014.14.2.87