e-Learning: The student experience

The paper draws on in‐depth qualitative. comments from student evaluation of an e‐learning module on an MSc in Information Technologies and Management, to develop a picture of their perspective on the experience. Questionnaires that yielded some basic quantitative data and a rich seam of qualitative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of educational technology Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 560 - 573
Main Authors Gilbert, Jennifer, Morton, Susan, Rowley, Jennifer
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2007
Blackwell Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-1013
1467-8535
DOI10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00723.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:The paper draws on in‐depth qualitative. comments from student evaluation of an e‐learning module on an MSc in Information Technologies and Management, to develop a picture of their perspective on the experience. Questionnaires that yielded some basic quantitative data and a rich seam of qualitative data were administered. General questions on satisfaction and dissatisfaction identified the criteria that student used in evaluation, while specific questions of aspects of the module generated some insights into the student learning process. The criteria used by students when expressing satisfaction are: synergy between theory and practice; specific subject themes; discussion forums and other student interaction; and, other learning support. The themes that are associated with dissatisfaction include: robustness and usability of platform; access to resources (such as articles and books); currency of study materials; and, student work scheduling. Aspects of the student learning experience that should inform the development of e‐learning include: each student engages differently; printing means that students use the integrated learning environment as a menu; discussion threads and interaction are appreciated, but students are unsure in making contributions; and, expectations about the tutor's role in e‐learning are unformed.
Bibliography:istex:6A5F421C1A59C3167345108FF1D698F593591557
ArticleID:BJET723
ark:/67375/WNG-KX0VSWLZ-T
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1013
1467-8535
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00723.x