The UK relative to other single payer-dominated healthcare markets for regenerative medicine therapies

The UK has for many years been considered by businesses, including those based in the UK, as at best a second market for the launch of innovative medical technology products. Historically, this has been attributed to the slow pace of adoption in its National Health Service (NHS). The NHS is perceive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRegenerative medicine Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 429 - 438
Main Authors Rose, James B, Williams, David J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Future Medicine Ltd 01.05.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1746-0751
1746-076X
1746-076X
DOI10.2217/rme.11.125

Cover

More Information
Summary:The UK has for many years been considered by businesses, including those based in the UK, as at best a second market for the launch of innovative medical technology products. Historically, this has been attributed to the slow pace of adoption in its National Health Service (NHS). The NHS is perceived to be subject to cost containment, high levels of fragmentation and a lack of strategic incentives to resolve its key failings as a market. Canada and Sweden offer examples of different operating models of healthcare delivery in a single payer-dominated market, and as a consequence, have evolved with different market characteristics. Together, these economies represent an important subsection of healthcare markets that are predominantly publically funded. This report examines the barriers to market entry for regenerative medicine products in these economies and attempts to evaluate the upcoming UK healthcare reforms in terms of impact on the regenerative medicine industry sector.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1746-0751
1746-076X
1746-076X
DOI:10.2217/rme.11.125