The UK relative to other single payer-dominated healthcare markets for regenerative medicine therapies
The UK has for many years been considered by businesses, including those based in the UK, as at best a second market for the launch of innovative medical technology products. Historically, this has been attributed to the slow pace of adoption in its National Health Service (NHS). The NHS is perceive...
Saved in:
| Published in | Regenerative medicine Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 429 - 438 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
Future Medicine Ltd
01.05.2012
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1746-0751 1746-076X 1746-076X |
| DOI | 10.2217/rme.11.125 |
Cover
| Summary: | The UK has for many years been considered by businesses, including those based in the UK, as at best a second market for the launch of innovative medical technology products. Historically, this has been attributed to the slow pace of adoption in its National Health Service (NHS). The NHS is perceived to be subject to cost containment, high levels of fragmentation and a lack of strategic incentives to resolve its key failings as a market. Canada and Sweden offer examples of different operating models of healthcare delivery in a single payer-dominated market, and as a consequence, have evolved with different market characteristics. Together, these economies represent an important subsection of healthcare markets that are predominantly publically funded. This report examines the barriers to market entry for regenerative medicine products in these economies and attempts to evaluate the upcoming UK healthcare reforms in terms of impact on the regenerative medicine industry sector. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Report-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1746-0751 1746-076X 1746-076X |
| DOI: | 10.2217/rme.11.125 |