SMA valiant trial: A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of valproic acid in ambulatory adults with spinal muscular atrophy

ABSTRACT Introduction: An open‐label trial suggested that valproic acid (VPA) improved strength in adults with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). We report a 12‐month, double‐blind, cross‐over study of VPA in ambulatory SMA adults. Methods: There were 33 subjects, aged 20–55 years, included in this inve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMuscle & nerve Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 187 - 192
Main Authors Kissel, John T., Elsheikh, Bakri, King, Wendy M., Freimer, Miriam, Scott, Charles B., Kolb, Stephen J., Reyna, Sandra P., Crawford, Thomas O., Simard, Louise R., Krosschell, Kristin J., Acsadi, Gyula, Schroth, Mary K., D'Anjou, Guy, LaSalle, Bernard, Prior, Thomas W., Sorenson, Susan, Maczulski, Jo Anne, Swoboda, Kathryn J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0148-639X
1097-4598
1097-4598
DOI10.1002/mus.23904

Cover

More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Introduction: An open‐label trial suggested that valproic acid (VPA) improved strength in adults with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). We report a 12‐month, double‐blind, cross‐over study of VPA in ambulatory SMA adults. Methods: There were 33 subjects, aged 20–55 years, included in this investigation. After baseline assessment, subjects were randomized to receive VPA (10–20 mg/kg/day) or placebo. At 6 months, patients were switched to the other group. Assessments were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was the 6‐month change in maximum voluntary isometric contraction testing with pulmonary, electrophysiological, and functional secondary outcomes. Results: Thirty subjects completed the study. VPA was well tolerated, and compliance was good. There was no change in primary or secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 months. Conclusions: VPA did not improve strength or function in SMA adults. The outcomes used are feasible and reliable and can be employed in future trials in SMA adults. Muscle Nerve 49: 187–192, 2014
Bibliography:Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, Ohio State University - No. UL1RR025755
ArticleID:MUS23904
istex:96F4DF809DC652AF9B80B741D8BB026626E626BD
ark:/67375/WNG-XD4CJMBG-2
Families of Spinal Muscular Atrophy and also by grants from the Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Utah - No. UL1RR025764
J.K. received drugs from Abbott Pharmaceuticals for a clinical trial in SMA, is a paid consultant for Alexion Pharmaceuticals and Cytokinetics, and is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH U10 NS77382‐2 for NeuroNEXT). B.E. received drugs from Abbott Pharmaceuticals for a clinical trial in SMA. S.R. has received grants from Families of SMA. K.K has received grant funding from the Families of SMA. G.A. receives funding from NIH/NINDS. B.L. received grants from Families of SMA and the National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025764 to the University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science). K.S. has contracts with ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Orphamed, and Biomarin for clinical trials and receives grant support from the NIH (R01‐HD69045 from NICHD and U10 NS077305 from NINDS), the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the Alternating Hemiplegia of Childhood Foundation. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.
Disclosures
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.23904