Preclinical Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Profile of a Glycine Transporter Type 1 (Glyt1) Inhibitor

Bitopertin is a glycine type 1 (GlyT1) inhibitor intended for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The principle adverse effect in the regulatory reproductive toxicity studies was peri‐natal pup death when rat dams were treated during parturition at a dose resulting in five‐times the human therap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBirth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology Vol. 107; no. 3; pp. 148 - 156
Main Authors Barrow, Paul, Parrott, Neil, Alberati, Daniela, Paehler, Axel, Koerner, Annette
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1542-9733
1542-9741
DOI10.1002/bdrb.21179

Cover

More Information
Summary:Bitopertin is a glycine type 1 (GlyT1) inhibitor intended for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The principle adverse effect in the regulatory reproductive toxicity studies was peri‐natal pup death when rat dams were treated during parturition at a dose resulting in five‐times the human therapeutic exposure (AUC). Cessation of dosing two days before parturition prevented the pup deaths. Investigatory experiments and pharmacokinetic modelling suggested that the neonatal mortality was related to transplacental passage of bitopertin leading to high systemic levels in the newborn pups. Brain levels of bitopertin in the rat fetus and neonate were two‐fold higher than in the mother. As illustrated by knock‐out mice models, GlyT1 function is essential for neonatal pup survival in rodents, but is not necessary for normal prenatal morphological development. The glycine transport systems are immature at birth in the rat, but are functionally well‐developed in the human newborn. While the relevance to humans of the neonatal mortality seen in rats following late gestational exposure is unknown, bitopertin would not be recommended for use during late pregnancy unless the anticipated benefit for the mother outweighs the potential risk to the newborn.
Bibliography:ArticleID:BDRB21179
istex:6E4F99D1A19B8425CB8CD49B02962532F2957597
ark:/67375/WNG-L9QCQGCS-R
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1542-9733
1542-9741
DOI:10.1002/bdrb.21179