Validity and Reliability of a Nutritional Screening Tool (SCAN) in Children Newly Diagnosed with Cancer

• Published in: Nutrition and cancer Vol. 74; no. 5; pp. 1754 - 1765
• Main Authors: Cañedo, Gustavo, Palomino Pérez, Laura María, Puerta Macfarland, Laura Andrea, Ruano Dominguez, David, Cañedo-Villaroya, Elvira, Garcia Alcolea, Beatriz, Madero López, Luis, Pedrón-Giner, Consuelo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Taylor & Francis 28.05.2022; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Anthropometry; blood; Cancer; childhood; Children; cross-sectional studies; hospitals; Malnutrition; Micronutrients; Nutrition; Nutrition assessment; nutrition risk assessment; Patients; Pediatrics; Questionnaires; Reliability analysis; Risk; Spain; Undernutrition; Spain
• ISSN: 0163-5581; 1532-7914; 1532-7914
• DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2021.1970782

No standardized approach towards nutritional screening and assessment of pediatric oncology patients has been established. The nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN) has been previously published as an effective screening method. This is an observational cross-sectional study to assess the validity and reliability of the SCAN tool, compare it to the detection of undernutrition using standard measures of assessment, and determine the overall prevalence of malnutrition and micronutrients alterations in our cohort. We included children newly diagnosed with cancer in a pediatric tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain from August 2018 to May 2019. The following measurements were performed: SCAN questionnaire, anthropometric measurements, nutritional markers in blood, and micronutrient levels. A total of 49 patients were included. 22 patients (45%) were at risk of malnutrition according to the SCAN questionnaire. Four patients (8%) could be diagnosed with moderate undernutrition. These undernourished patients were distributed homogeneously among at-risk and not at-risk populations identified by the SCAN tool. Several micronutrient deficiencies were identified. We conclude that the SCAN questionnaire is an easy-to-use tool for everyday clinical practice. By not including anthropometric measurements it misses patients considered to be malnourished. Future data might help clarify if it is an effective tool in predicting a higher nutritional risk during the entire treatment course.