A Multi-Observer Study Examining the Radiographic Visibility of Fishbone Foreign Bodies
The use of plain radiographs to localize a suspected fishbone foreign body is the subject of controversy. Accordingly radiographs of 14 species of fishbone, impacted in a soft tissue phantom, were assessed by a series of observers from the ENT department (consultant surgeons, senior registrars and h...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Vol. 89; no. 1; pp. 31 - 34 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
Royal Society of Medicine
01.01.1996
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0141-0768 1758-1095 1758-1095 |
| DOI | 10.1177/014107689608900109 |
Cover
| Summary: | The use of plain radiographs to localize a suspected fishbone foreign body is the subject of controversy. Accordingly radiographs of 14 species of fishbone, impacted in a soft tissue phantom, were assessed by a series of observers from the ENT department (consultant surgeons, senior registrars and house officers). The agreement was assessed by graphical description of the data and tested by a Spearman's rank correlation test The overall results showed that, for the clinician, radiography is very useful to detect the bones of: cod, haddock, lemon sole, cole fish, grey mullet and plaice; useful for red snapper, monk fish, gurnard and salmon; and unhelpful in detecting bones from herring, pike, mackerel and trout The use of radiographs to locate these impacted fishbones can be rationalized in the light of these findings. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0141-0768 1758-1095 1758-1095 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/014107689608900109 |