The Governance Landscape of Geospatial E-Services—The Belgian Case

• Published in: ISPRS international journal of geo-information Vol. 6; no. 9; p. 282
• Main Authors: Chantillon, Maxim, Crompvoets, Joep, Peristeras, Vassilios
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 07.09.2017
• Subjects: Belgium; coordination; Data; e-services; geospatial data; Governance; interviews; landscapes; Organizational aspects; Regions; Spatial data; stakeholders; Surveying; surveys; Transposition; Belgium
• ISSN: 2220-9964; 2220-9964
• DOI: 10.3390/ijgi6090282

Geospatial data and geospatial e-services require governance and coordination between different governmental organisations. This article aims to understand what governance, and specifically what coordination, is used in Belgium for geospatial e-services and data. The Belgian case, with a focus on the regions and federal administration, is researched by making use of a document analysis, interviews with key stakeholders and an online survey. In contrast to the federal and Walloon administration, the Flemish administration and the Brussels Capital Region administration have a clearly developed governance model. Flanders combines hierarchy with network governance, whereas the Brussels administration is known for its hierarchical way of working. The transposition of the INSPIRE Directive had a strong influence: The Brussels Capital Region became more network-oriented, and the Walloon Region developed a form of network governance. The federal level, however, struggles to make the connection between geospatial data and e-services. From an inter-organisational perspective, the coordination can be labelled as a weak form of network governance: Cooperation exists, but only in a few areas. Nevertheless, geospatial data are exchanged within and between regions and the federal level. Geospatial e-services are also developed but there is a clear influence of the degree of organisational coordination on the development of geospatial e-services.