Identification of putative new tomato allergens and differential interaction with IgEs of tomato allergic subjects
Summary Background Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or...
Saved in:
| Published in | Clinical and experimental allergy Vol. 43; no. 12; pp. 1419 - 1427 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0954-7894 1365-2222 1365-2222 |
| DOI | 10.1111/cea.12207 |
Cover
| Abstract | Summary
Background
Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected.
Objective
This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions.
Methods
Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2‐D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests.
Results
In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo‐β‐mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function.
Conclusion and Clinical Relevance
The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Summary Background Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. Objective This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Methods Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. Results In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo-[beta]-mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected.BACKGROUNDTomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected.This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions.OBJECTIVEThis study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions.Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests.METHODSProteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests.In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo-β-mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function.RESULTSIn total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo-β-mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function.The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified.CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCEThe hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified. Summary Background Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. Objective This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Methods Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2‐D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. Results In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo‐β‐mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified. Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo-β-mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified. Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo- beta -mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified. |
| Author | Weckwerth, W. Welter, S. Lehmann, K. Dölle, S. Schwarz, D. Scheler, C. Worm, M. Franken, P. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: S. surname: Welter fullname: Welter, S. organization: Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Groβbeeren/Erfurt e.V., Großbeeren, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: K. surname: Lehmann fullname: Lehmann, K. organization: Proteome Factory AG, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: S. surname: Dölle fullname: Dölle, S. organization: Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Allergy-Center-Charité, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 4 givenname: D. surname: Schwarz fullname: Schwarz, D. organization: Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Groβbeeren/Erfurt e.V., Großbeeren, Germany – sequence: 5 givenname: W. surname: Weckwerth fullname: Weckwerth, W. organization: Department of Molecular Systems Biology, Faculty of Life Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria – sequence: 6 givenname: C. surname: Scheler fullname: Scheler, C. organization: Proteome Factory AG, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 7 givenname: M. surname: Worm fullname: Worm, M. organization: Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Allergy-Center-Charité, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany – sequence: 8 givenname: P. surname: Franken fullname: Franken, P. organization: Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Groβbeeren/Erfurt e.V., Großbeeren, Germany |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24118131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNkc1uEzEUhS1URNOWBS-ALLGhi2ltz4x_liUKJVC1C6hYWo7nujhMPKntIe3bM_mrRAUSd-O7-L4jXZ8jdBC6AAi9oeSMDnNuwZxRxoh4gUa05HXBhjlAI6LqqhBSVYfoKKU5IaSslXyFDllFqaQlHaE4bSBk77w12XcBdw4v-zzsvwAHWOHcLUzusGlbiHcQEjahwY13DuLaMy32IUM0dmOvfP6Bp3eTtM75Q_UWp342B5vTCXrpTJvg9e49RrcfJ9_Gn4qrm8vp-OKqsBWrRAGUKCkpN5bMKu4YEMMbY2eidk4RZWxZKskNZwQ4IbyiFiSVpjEOOAcO5TF6v81dxu6-h5T1wicLbWsCdH3StFKMU6GU-h-UCCqFFAP67hk67_oYhkM0rZmqCRP1OvDtjupnC2j0MvqFiY96__EDcL4FbOxSiuC09XlTQY7Gt5oSva5WD9XqTbWDcfrM2If-jd2lr3wLj_8G9XhysTeKreFThocnw8SfmotS1Pr79aX-_PWDol9Krq_L313_wV8 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1159_000434680 crossref_primary_10_1007_s15007_015_0942_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2014_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1111_cea_12442 crossref_primary_10_3233_HAB_180357 crossref_primary_10_1021_jf502292g crossref_primary_10_1111_cea_13099 crossref_primary_10_1002_mnfr_201500782 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40629_015_0073_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_pathogens10010022 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2022_7264 crossref_primary_10_1080_09540105_2023_2257398 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02364.x 10.1007/s002170100343 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60363-8 10.1067/mai.2003.173 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283464c74 10.1159/000049526 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.067 10.1023/A:1021206826750 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02795.x 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03167.x 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03503.x 10.1021/pr100604x 10.1002/elps.11501601175 10.1007/s11883-009-0065-z 10.1016/S0301-0546(03)79162-9 10.1016/0168-9452(96)04420-2 10.1002/jsfa.4443 10.1104/pp.011890 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833973fb 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01222.x 10.1007/s00572-010-0345-z 10.1159/000096114 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01369.x 10.1007/s10493-006-9009-2 10.1002/mnfr.200400047 10.1016/j.anai.2010.11.022 10.1371/journal.pone.0017800 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.027 10.1021/pr800186d 10.1371/journal.pone.0054755 10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00403.x 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90078-2 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00895.x 10.1096/fj.10.163063 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01186-8 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62834-7 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90083-3 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00175.x 10.1371/journal.pone.0065116 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03841.x 10.1016/j.gene.2005.04.026 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.008 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01703.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 H94 K9. 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/cea.12207 |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Immunology Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Immunology Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Biology |
| EISSN | 1365-2222 |
| EndPage | 1427 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3317391181 24118131 10_1111_cea_12207 CEA12207 ark_67375_WNG_JSB91K36_N |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Ministries of Consumer Protection – fundername: Food and Agriculture of the Federal Republic of Germany |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29B 31~ 33P 36B 3O- 3SF 4.4 4P2 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6J9 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 A8Z AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHEFC AHMBA AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB AOETA ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EAD EAP EAS EBB EBC EBD EBS EBX EDH EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESTFP ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 Q~Q R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR X7M XG1 YFH YUY ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHHS ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE WRC WUP AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 H94 K9. 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4247-e1098816ac0b46f2e0a6dacb75ff909ac33986a620e600641ce818adafe66e6e3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0954-7894 1365-2222 |
| IngestDate | Mon Sep 08 06:51:55 EDT 2025 Mon Sep 08 10:30:36 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 06 17:41:49 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:37:29 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:33:13 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:13 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:55:19 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:17:27 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | skin prick test western blot tomato allergy immunoblot tomato allergens |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4247-e1098816ac0b46f2e0a6dacb75ff909ac33986a620e600641ce818adafe66e6e3 |
| Notes | Food and Agriculture of the Federal Republic of Germany ark:/67375/WNG-JSB91K36-N Ministries of Consumer Protection ArticleID:CEA12207 istex:07312409BCF6ACA872FFEB94EB821D88C1ED0278 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
| PMID | 24118131 |
| PQID | 1529502759 |
| PQPubID | 36521 |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1492617999 proquest_miscellaneous_1490718787 proquest_journals_1529502759 pubmed_primary_24118131 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cea_12207 crossref_primary_10_1111_cea_12207 wiley_primary_10_1111_cea_12207_CEA12207 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_JSB91K36_N |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | December 2013 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2013 text: December 2013 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | Clinical and experimental allergy |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Exp Allergy |
| PublicationYear | 2013 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Heinzerling L, Frew AJ, Bindslev-Jensen C et al. Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe - a survey from the GA(2)LEN network. Allergy 2005; 60:1287-300. Cadot P, Diaz JF, Proost P et al. Purification and characterization of an 18-kd allergen of birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen: Identification as a cyclophilin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 105:286-91. Nishino H, Murakoshi M, Ii T et al. Carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2002; 21:257-64. Yamamoto N, Tsugane T, Watanabe M et al. Expressed sequence tags from the laboratory-grown miniature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivar Micro-Tom and mining for single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in tomato cultivars. Gene 2005; 356:127-34. Kaulfuerst-Soboll H, Mertens M, Brehler R, von Schaewen A. Reduction of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in plant foodstuff: elucidation of clinical relevance and implications for allergy diagnosis. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17800. Steckelbroeck S, Ballmer-Weber BK, Vieths S. Potential, pitfalls, and prospects of food allergy diagnostics with recombinant allergens or synthetic sequential epitopes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121:1323-30. Niederberger V, Purohit A, Oster JP, Spitzauer S, Valenta R, Pauli G. The allergen profile of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: cross-reactivity with allergens from various plant species. Clin Exp Allergy 2002; 32:933-41. Asero R. Tomato Allergy: Clinical Features and Usefulness of Current Routinely Available Diagnostic Methods. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2013; 23:37-42. Schwarz D, Welter S, George E et al. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the allergenic potential of tomato. Mycorrhiza 2010; 21:341-9. Dölle S, Schwarz D, Lehmann K et al. Tomato allergy: impact of genotype and environmental factors on the biological response. J Sci Food Agric 2011; 91:2234-40. Geroldinger-Simic M, Zelniker T, Aberer W et al. Birch pollen-related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen-specific IgE and IgG(4) antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127:616-22. Murakami S, Kondo Y, Nakano T, Sato F. Protease activity of CND41, a chloroplast nucleoid DNA-binding protein, isolated from cultured tobacco cells. FEBS Lett 2000; 468:15-8. Asero R. Detection and clinical characterization of patients with oral allergy syndrome caused by stable allergens in Rosaceae and nuts. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999; 83:377-83. Bassler OY, Weiss J, Wienkoop S et al. Evidence for novel tomato seed allergens: IgE-reactive Legumin and Vicilin proteins identified by multidimensional protein fractionation-mass spectrometry and in Silico Epitope modeling. J Proteome Res 2009; 8:1111-22. Aina R, Asero R, Ghiani A, Marconi G, Albertini E, Citterio S. Exposure to cadmium-contaminated soils increases allergenicity of Poa annua L. pollen. Allergy 2010; 65:1313-21. Mari A, Ooievaar-de Heer P, Scala E et al. Evaluation by double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge of the clinical relevance of IgE antibodies against plant glycans. Allergy 2008; 63:891-6. Foetisch K, Westphal S, Lauer I et al. Biological activity of IgE specific for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111:889-96. Klose J, Kobalz U. 2-Dimensional electrophoresis of proteins - an updated protocol and implications for a functional-analysis of the genome. Electrophoresis 1995; 16:1034-59. Fromberg J. IgE as a marker in allergy and the role of IgE affinity. Allergy 2006; 61:1234. Welter S, Dölle S, Lehmann K et al. Pepino mosaic virus infection of tomato affects allergen expression, but not the allergenic potential of fruits. PLoS One 2013; 8:e65116. Altmann F. The role of protein glycosylation in allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007; 142:99-115. Ballmer-Weber BK, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K. Molecular diagnosis of fruit and vegetable allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 11:229-35. Dölle S, Lehmann K, Schwarz D et al. Allergenic activity of different tomato cultivars in tomato allergic subjects. Clin Exp Allergy 2011; 41:1643-52. Lopez-Matas MA, Ferrer A, Larramendi CH et al. In vitro cross-reactivity between tomato and other plant allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009; 103:425-31. Westphal S, Kolarich D, Foetisch K et al. Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (beta-fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato. Eur J Biochem 2003; 270:1327-37. Katelaris CH. Food allergy and oral allergy or pollen-food syndrome. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 10:246-51. Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S, Arcidiacono R, Fortunato D. Detection of a Novel Allergen in Raw Tomato. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2008; 18:397-400. Pastorello EA, Robino AM. Clinical role of lipid transfer proteins in food allergy. Mol Nutr Food Res 2004; 48:356-62. Riccioni G. Carotenoids and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2009; 11:434-9. Zuberbier T, Edenharter G, Worm M et al. Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany - a population study. Allergy 2004; 59:338-45. Armentia A, Callejo A, Diaz-Perales A, Martin-Gil FJ, Salcedo G. Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones. Allergol Immunopathol 2003; 31:44-6. Foetisch K, Son DY, Altmann F et al. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) allergens in pollen-allergic patients. Eur Food Res Technol 2001; 213:259-66. Bourgault R, Bewley JD. Variation in its C-terminal amino acids determines whether endo-beta-mannanase is active or inactive in ripening tomato fruits of different cultivars. Plant Physiol 2002; 130:1254-62. Worm M, Edenharter G, Rueff F et al. Symptom profile and risk factors of anaphylaxis in Central Europe. Allergy 2012; 67:691-8. Le LQ, Mahler V, Scheurer S et al. Yeast profilin complements profilin deficiency in transgenic tomato fruits and allows development of hypoallergenic tomato fruits. Faseb J 2010; 24:4939-47. Le LQ, Lorenz Y, Scheurer S et al. Design of tomato fruits with reduced allergenicity by dsRNAi-mediated inhibition of ns-LTP (Lyc e 3) expression. Plant Biotechnol J 2006; 4:231-42. Kondo Y, Urisu A, Tokuda R. Identification and characterization of the allergens in the tomato fruit by immunoblotting. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2001; 126:294-9. Terefe NS, Gamage M, Vilkhu K, Simons L, Mawson R, Versteeg C. The kinetics of inactivation of pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonase in tomato juice by thermosonication. Food Chem 2009; 117:20-7. Cardona G, Guisantes J, Eraso E, Serna LA, Martinez J. Enzymatic analysis of Blomia tropicalis and Blomia kulagini (Acari: Echimyopodidae) allergenic extracts obtained from different phases of culture growth. Exp Appl Acarol 2006; 39:281-8. Asero R, Antonicelli L, Arena A et al. EpidemAAITO: Features of food allergy in Italian adults attending allergy clinics: a multi-centre study. Clin Exp Allergy 2009; 39:547-55. Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello EA, Ansaloni R, Magri GC. Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with Fresh Foods and Commercial Food Extracts) and rast in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989; 83:683-90. Singh B, Oellerich M, Kumar R et al. Immuno-reactive molecules identified from the secreted proteome of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Proteome Res 2010; 9:5517-29. Sharma P, Gaur SN, Arora N. In silico Identification of IgE-Binding Epitopes of Osmotin Protein. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54755. Lopez-Matas M, Larramendi C, Ferrer A et al. Identification and quantification of tomato allergens: in vitro characterization of six different varieties. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 106:230-8. Abad LR, Durzo MP, Liu D et al. Antifungal activity of tobacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization. Plant Sci 1996; 118:11-23. 2010; 10 1989; 83 1995; 16 2002; 130 2013; 23 2005; 356 2008; 18 2006; 39 2004; 48 2002; 32 2007; 142 2011; 11 2003; 270 2006; 4 2005; 60 1999; 83 2013; 8 2011; 6 2008; 121 2003; 31 2001; 126 2003; 111 2009; 117 2011; 127 2009; 11 2010; 21 2010; 65 2006; 61 2010; 24 2011; 106 2011; 91 2000; 468 2000; 105 2004; 59 2002; 21 2011; 41 2009; 8 2008; 63 2012; 67 2009; 103 2001; 213 1996; 118 2010; 9 2009; 39 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 Asero R (e_1_2_7_40_1) 2013; 23 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_45_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_46_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 Armentia A (e_1_2_7_11_1) 2003; 31 Asero R (e_1_2_7_38_1) 2008; 18 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 |
| References_xml | – reference: Kaulfuerst-Soboll H, Mertens M, Brehler R, von Schaewen A. Reduction of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in plant foodstuff: elucidation of clinical relevance and implications for allergy diagnosis. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17800. – reference: Welter S, Dölle S, Lehmann K et al. Pepino mosaic virus infection of tomato affects allergen expression, but not the allergenic potential of fruits. PLoS One 2013; 8:e65116. – reference: Katelaris CH. Food allergy and oral allergy or pollen-food syndrome. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 10:246-51. – reference: Terefe NS, Gamage M, Vilkhu K, Simons L, Mawson R, Versteeg C. The kinetics of inactivation of pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonase in tomato juice by thermosonication. Food Chem 2009; 117:20-7. – reference: Altmann F. The role of protein glycosylation in allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007; 142:99-115. – reference: Riccioni G. Carotenoids and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2009; 11:434-9. – reference: Lopez-Matas M, Larramendi C, Ferrer A et al. Identification and quantification of tomato allergens: in vitro characterization of six different varieties. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 106:230-8. – reference: Asero R, Antonicelli L, Arena A et al. EpidemAAITO: Features of food allergy in Italian adults attending allergy clinics: a multi-centre study. Clin Exp Allergy 2009; 39:547-55. – reference: Fromberg J. IgE as a marker in allergy and the role of IgE affinity. Allergy 2006; 61:1234. – reference: Yamamoto N, Tsugane T, Watanabe M et al. Expressed sequence tags from the laboratory-grown miniature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivar Micro-Tom and mining for single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in tomato cultivars. Gene 2005; 356:127-34. – reference: Cadot P, Diaz JF, Proost P et al. Purification and characterization of an 18-kd allergen of birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen: Identification as a cyclophilin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 105:286-91. – reference: Nishino H, Murakoshi M, Ii T et al. Carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2002; 21:257-64. – reference: Pastorello EA, Robino AM. Clinical role of lipid transfer proteins in food allergy. Mol Nutr Food Res 2004; 48:356-62. – reference: Zuberbier T, Edenharter G, Worm M et al. Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany - a population study. Allergy 2004; 59:338-45. – reference: Asero R. Detection and clinical characterization of patients with oral allergy syndrome caused by stable allergens in Rosaceae and nuts. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999; 83:377-83. – reference: Geroldinger-Simic M, Zelniker T, Aberer W et al. Birch pollen-related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen-specific IgE and IgG(4) antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127:616-22. – reference: Klose J, Kobalz U. 2-Dimensional electrophoresis of proteins - an updated protocol and implications for a functional-analysis of the genome. Electrophoresis 1995; 16:1034-59. – reference: Bourgault R, Bewley JD. Variation in its C-terminal amino acids determines whether endo-beta-mannanase is active or inactive in ripening tomato fruits of different cultivars. Plant Physiol 2002; 130:1254-62. – reference: Le LQ, Mahler V, Scheurer S et al. Yeast profilin complements profilin deficiency in transgenic tomato fruits and allows development of hypoallergenic tomato fruits. Faseb J 2010; 24:4939-47. – reference: Le LQ, Lorenz Y, Scheurer S et al. Design of tomato fruits with reduced allergenicity by dsRNAi-mediated inhibition of ns-LTP (Lyc e 3) expression. Plant Biotechnol J 2006; 4:231-42. – reference: Lopez-Matas MA, Ferrer A, Larramendi CH et al. In vitro cross-reactivity between tomato and other plant allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009; 103:425-31. – reference: Niederberger V, Purohit A, Oster JP, Spitzauer S, Valenta R, Pauli G. The allergen profile of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: cross-reactivity with allergens from various plant species. Clin Exp Allergy 2002; 32:933-41. – reference: Mari A, Ooievaar-de Heer P, Scala E et al. Evaluation by double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge of the clinical relevance of IgE antibodies against plant glycans. Allergy 2008; 63:891-6. – reference: Foetisch K, Westphal S, Lauer I et al. Biological activity of IgE specific for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111:889-96. – reference: Foetisch K, Son DY, Altmann F et al. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) allergens in pollen-allergic patients. Eur Food Res Technol 2001; 213:259-66. – reference: Sharma P, Gaur SN, Arora N. In silico Identification of IgE-Binding Epitopes of Osmotin Protein. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54755. – reference: Kondo Y, Urisu A, Tokuda R. Identification and characterization of the allergens in the tomato fruit by immunoblotting. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2001; 126:294-9. – reference: Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S, Arcidiacono R, Fortunato D. Detection of a Novel Allergen in Raw Tomato. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2008; 18:397-400. – reference: Worm M, Edenharter G, Rueff F et al. Symptom profile and risk factors of anaphylaxis in Central Europe. Allergy 2012; 67:691-8. – reference: Bassler OY, Weiss J, Wienkoop S et al. Evidence for novel tomato seed allergens: IgE-reactive Legumin and Vicilin proteins identified by multidimensional protein fractionation-mass spectrometry and in Silico Epitope modeling. J Proteome Res 2009; 8:1111-22. – reference: Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello EA, Ansaloni R, Magri GC. Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with Fresh Foods and Commercial Food Extracts) and rast in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989; 83:683-90. – reference: Westphal S, Kolarich D, Foetisch K et al. Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (beta-fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato. Eur J Biochem 2003; 270:1327-37. – reference: Dölle S, Lehmann K, Schwarz D et al. Allergenic activity of different tomato cultivars in tomato allergic subjects. Clin Exp Allergy 2011; 41:1643-52. – reference: Heinzerling L, Frew AJ, Bindslev-Jensen C et al. Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe - a survey from the GA(2)LEN network. Allergy 2005; 60:1287-300. – reference: Murakami S, Kondo Y, Nakano T, Sato F. Protease activity of CND41, a chloroplast nucleoid DNA-binding protein, isolated from cultured tobacco cells. FEBS Lett 2000; 468:15-8. – reference: Asero R. Tomato Allergy: Clinical Features and Usefulness of Current Routinely Available Diagnostic Methods. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2013; 23:37-42. – reference: Ballmer-Weber BK, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K. Molecular diagnosis of fruit and vegetable allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 11:229-35. – reference: Abad LR, Durzo MP, Liu D et al. Antifungal activity of tobacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization. Plant Sci 1996; 118:11-23. – reference: Steckelbroeck S, Ballmer-Weber BK, Vieths S. Potential, pitfalls, and prospects of food allergy diagnostics with recombinant allergens or synthetic sequential epitopes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121:1323-30. – reference: Dölle S, Schwarz D, Lehmann K et al. Tomato allergy: impact of genotype and environmental factors on the biological response. J Sci Food Agric 2011; 91:2234-40. – reference: Singh B, Oellerich M, Kumar R et al. Immuno-reactive molecules identified from the secreted proteome of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Proteome Res 2010; 9:5517-29. – reference: Schwarz D, Welter S, George E et al. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the allergenic potential of tomato. Mycorrhiza 2010; 21:341-9. – reference: Aina R, Asero R, Ghiani A, Marconi G, Albertini E, Citterio S. Exposure to cadmium-contaminated soils increases allergenicity of Poa annua L. pollen. Allergy 2010; 65:1313-21. – reference: Cardona G, Guisantes J, Eraso E, Serna LA, Martinez J. Enzymatic analysis of Blomia tropicalis and Blomia kulagini (Acari: Echimyopodidae) allergenic extracts obtained from different phases of culture growth. Exp Appl Acarol 2006; 39:281-8. – reference: Armentia A, Callejo A, Diaz-Perales A, Martin-Gil FJ, Salcedo G. Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones. Allergol Immunopathol 2003; 31:44-6. – volume: 91 start-page: 2234 year: 2011 end-page: 40 article-title: Tomato allergy: impact of genotype and environmental factors on the biological response publication-title: J Sci Food Agric – volume: 67 start-page: 691 year: 2012 end-page: 8 article-title: Symptom profile and risk factors of anaphylaxis in Central Europe publication-title: Allergy – volume: 8 start-page: 1111 year: 2009 end-page: 22 article-title: Evidence for novel tomato seed allergens: IgE‐reactive Legumin and Vicilin proteins identified by multidimensional protein fractionation‐mass spectrometry and in Silico Epitope modeling publication-title: J Proteome Res – volume: 142 start-page: 99 year: 2007 end-page: 115 article-title: The role of protein glycosylation in allergy publication-title: Int Arch Allergy Immunol – volume: 11 start-page: 229 year: 2011 end-page: 35 article-title: Molecular diagnosis of fruit and vegetable allergy publication-title: Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol – volume: 106 start-page: 230 year: 2011 end-page: 8 article-title: Identification and quantification of tomato allergens: in vitro characterization of six different varieties publication-title: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol – volume: 32 start-page: 933 year: 2002 end-page: 41 article-title: The allergen profile of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: cross‐reactivity with allergens from various plant species publication-title: Clin Exp Allergy – volume: 8 start-page: e54755 year: 2013 article-title: In silico Identification of IgE‐Binding Epitopes of Osmotin Protein publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 24 start-page: 4939 year: 2010 end-page: 47 article-title: Yeast profilin complements profilin deficiency in transgenic tomato fruits and allows development of hypoallergenic tomato fruits publication-title: Faseb J – volume: 18 start-page: 397 year: 2008 end-page: 400 article-title: Detection of a Novel Allergen in Raw Tomato publication-title: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol – volume: 270 start-page: 1327 year: 2003 end-page: 37 article-title: Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (beta‐fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato publication-title: Eur J Biochem – volume: 39 start-page: 281 year: 2006 end-page: 8 article-title: Enzymatic analysis of Blomia tropicalis and Blomia kulagini (Acari: Echimyopodidae) allergenic extracts obtained from different phases of culture growth publication-title: Exp Appl Acarol – volume: 105 start-page: 286 year: 2000 end-page: 91 article-title: Purification and characterization of an 18‐kd allergen of birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen: Identification as a cyclophilin publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol – volume: 21 start-page: 257 year: 2002 end-page: 64 article-title: Carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention publication-title: Cancer Metastasis Rev – volume: 356 start-page: 127 year: 2005 end-page: 34 article-title: Expressed sequence tags from the laboratory‐grown miniature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivar Micro‐Tom and mining for single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in tomato cultivars publication-title: Gene – volume: 83 start-page: 683 year: 1989 end-page: 90 article-title: Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with Fresh Foods and Commercial Food Extracts) and rast in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol – volume: 21 start-page: 341 year: 2010 end-page: 9 article-title: Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the allergenic potential of tomato publication-title: Mycorrhiza – volume: 130 start-page: 1254 year: 2002 end-page: 62 article-title: Variation in its C‐terminal amino acids determines whether endo‐beta‐mannanase is active or inactive in ripening tomato fruits of different cultivars publication-title: Plant Physiol – volume: 39 start-page: 547 year: 2009 end-page: 55 article-title: EpidemAAITO: Features of food allergy in Italian adults attending allergy clinics: a multi‐centre study publication-title: Clin Exp Allergy – volume: 59 start-page: 338 year: 2004 end-page: 45 article-title: Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany – a population study publication-title: Allergy – volume: 127 start-page: 616 year: 2011 end-page: 22 article-title: Birch pollen‐related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen‐specific IgE and IgG(4) antibodies publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol – volume: 83 start-page: 377 year: 1999 end-page: 83 article-title: Detection and clinical characterization of patients with oral allergy syndrome caused by stable allergens in Rosaceae and nuts publication-title: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol – volume: 468 start-page: 15 year: 2000 end-page: 8 article-title: Protease activity of CND41, a chloroplast nucleoid DNA‐binding protein, isolated from cultured tobacco cells publication-title: FEBS Lett – volume: 16 start-page: 1034 year: 1995 end-page: 59 article-title: 2‐Dimensional electrophoresis of proteins – an updated protocol and implications for a functional‐analysis of the genome publication-title: Electrophoresis – volume: 63 start-page: 891 year: 2008 end-page: 6 article-title: Evaluation by double‐blind placebo‐controlled oral challenge of the clinical relevance of IgE antibodies against plant glycans publication-title: Allergy – volume: 48 start-page: 356 year: 2004 end-page: 62 article-title: Clinical role of lipid transfer proteins in food allergy publication-title: Mol Nutr Food Res – volume: 213 start-page: 259 year: 2001 end-page: 66 article-title: Tomato ( ) allergens in pollen‐allergic patients publication-title: Eur Food Res Technol – volume: 6 start-page: e17800 year: 2011 article-title: Reduction of cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants in plant foodstuff: elucidation of clinical relevance and implications for allergy diagnosis publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 11 start-page: 434 year: 2009 end-page: 9 article-title: Carotenoids and cardiovascular disease publication-title: Curr Atheroscler Rep – volume: 10 start-page: 246 year: 2010 end-page: 51 article-title: Food allergy and oral allergy or pollen‐food syndrome publication-title: Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol – volume: 103 start-page: 425 year: 2009 end-page: 31 article-title: In vitro cross‐reactivity between tomato and other plant allergens publication-title: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol – volume: 4 start-page: 231 year: 2006 end-page: 42 article-title: Design of tomato fruits with reduced allergenicity by dsRNAi‐mediated inhibition of ns‐LTP (Lyc e 3) expression publication-title: Plant Biotechnol J – volume: 65 start-page: 1313 year: 2010 end-page: 21 article-title: Exposure to cadmium‐contaminated soils increases allergenicity of Poa annua L. pollen publication-title: Allergy – volume: 61 start-page: 1234 year: 2006 article-title: IgE as a marker in allergy and the role of IgE affinity publication-title: Allergy – volume: 118 start-page: 11 year: 1996 end-page: 23 article-title: Antifungal activity of tobacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization publication-title: Plant Sci – volume: 60 start-page: 1287 year: 2005 end-page: 300 article-title: Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe – a survey from the GA(2)LEN network publication-title: Allergy – volume: 117 start-page: 20 year: 2009 end-page: 7 article-title: The kinetics of inactivation of pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonase in tomato juice by thermosonication publication-title: Food Chem – volume: 126 start-page: 294 year: 2001 end-page: 9 article-title: Identification and characterization of the allergens in the tomato fruit by immunoblotting publication-title: Int Arch Allergy Immunol – volume: 111 start-page: 889 year: 2003 end-page: 96 article-title: Biological activity of IgE specific for cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol – volume: 8 start-page: e65116 year: 2013 article-title: Pepino mosaic virus infection of tomato affects allergen expression, but not the allergenic potential of fruits publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 9 start-page: 5517 year: 2010 end-page: 29 article-title: Immuno‐reactive molecules identified from the secreted proteome of publication-title: J Proteome Res – volume: 23 start-page: 37 year: 2013 end-page: 42 article-title: Tomato Allergy: Clinical Features and Usefulness of Current Routinely Available Diagnostic Methods publication-title: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol – volume: 41 start-page: 1643 year: 2011 end-page: 52 article-title: Allergenic activity of different tomato cultivars in tomato allergic subjects publication-title: Clin Exp Allergy – volume: 31 start-page: 44 year: 2003 end-page: 6 article-title: Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones publication-title: Allergol Immunopathol – volume: 121 start-page: 1323 year: 2008 end-page: 30 article-title: Potential, pitfalls, and prospects of food allergy diagnostics with recombinant allergens or synthetic sequential epitopes publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02364.x – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1007/s002170100343 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60363-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.173 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283464c74 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1159/000049526 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.067 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1021206826750 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02795.x – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03167.x – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03503.x – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1021/pr100604x – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1002/elps.11501601175 – volume: 18 start-page: 397 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 article-title: Detection of a Novel Allergen in Raw Tomato publication-title: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1007/s11883-009-0065-z – volume: 31 start-page: 44 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 article-title: Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones publication-title: Allergol Immunopathol doi: 10.1016/S0301-0546(03)79162-9 – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(96)04420-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4443 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1104/pp.011890 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833973fb – ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01222.x – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0345-z – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1159/000096114 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01369.x – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1007/s10493-006-9009-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200400047 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.11.022 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017800 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.027 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1021/pr800186d – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054755 – volume: 23 start-page: 37 year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 article-title: Tomato Allergy: Clinical Features and Usefulness of Current Routinely Available Diagnostic Methods publication-title: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00403.x – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90078-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00895.x – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1096/fj.10.163063 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01186-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_46_1 doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62834-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90083-3 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00175.x – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065116 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03841.x – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.04.026 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.008 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01703.x |
| SSID | ssj0003598 |
| Score | 2.162101 |
| Snippet | Summary
Background
Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting... Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As... Summary Background Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 1419 |
| SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Allergens - immunology Allergens - metabolism Allergies Antigens, Plant - immunology Antigens, Plant - metabolism Female Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis Food Hypersensitivity - immunology Food Hypersensitivity - metabolism Humans Hypotheses immunoblot Immunoglobulin E - immunology Immunoglobulin E - metabolism Lycopersicon esculentum Lycopersicon esculentum - adverse effects Male Plant Proteins - immunology Plant Proteins - metabolism Proteomics - methods skin prick test Skin Tests tomato allergens tomato allergy western blot Young Adult |
| Title | Identification of putative new tomato allergens and differential interaction with IgEs of tomato allergic subjects |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-JSB91K36-N/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcea.12207 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24118131 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1529502759 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1490718787 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1492617999 |
| Volume | 43 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 1365-2222 dateEnd: 20241028 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0003598 issn: 0954-7894 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 19890101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 0954-7894 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19970101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true eissn: 1365-2222 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0003598 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Ra9YwED_GhuKLm1Nn55QoIr70o23StGFPc3xzTvY9qMM9CCVNE5GNdnxtYfrXm0va6idTxLdCL6FJ75Jfcne_A3iBFHZJntqTqlAqZEyyUNidJDSpSiWlpTCOwPR0wY_P2Ml5er4G-2MujOeHmC7c0DLceo0GLsv2FyNXWs7iJHGZ5DHl7jj1_id1FDLTeZ49Fma5YAOrEEbxTC1X9qINnNbrm4DmKm51G8_RJnweP9nHm1zM-q6cqe-_sTn-55i24O4ASMmB16B7sKbrbbjlS1R-24bbp4Pz_T4sfVKvGW75SGPIVd854nBiwTnpGot-G4LFWTCjsyWyrshYgMUuJJcEuSmWPpOC4AUweftl3mI_K02_KtL2Jd4PtQ_g7Gj-8fA4HEo2hIolLAt1HIk8j7lUUcm4SXQkeSVVmaXGiEhIRanIueRJpDmioVhpixhkJY3mXHNNH8J63dT6EZA8U4lJeF5WZWX7Vjmz2hRFRlGOMIgG8Gr8eYUa-MyxrMZlMZ5r7GwWbjYDeD6JXnkSj5uEXjoNmCTk8gKj3rK0-LR4U5x8eC3id5QXiwD2RhUpBoNvixgdpugCFgE8m15bU0X_i6x101sZJiygy-0S-VcZ5Mi3sD2AHa9-0wdZsGXxGI3tyJ0S_XksxeH8wD3s_rvoY7iTYKkPF6qzB-vdstdPLODqyqfOsn4AFSIkTQ |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB5VrTheOMrRQAGDEOIlqxyOE0u8lGrL9th9gFb0pbIcx0ZVq6TaJBLw6_E4BywqCPEWKWMrdmbszzOebwBeI4VdlCX2pMqV8imV1Od2J_FNohIZxzk3jsB0vmCzE3pwmpyuwbshF6bjhxgdbmgZbr1GA0eH9C9WrrSchFGEqeQblNlzCkKijz_Jo5CbrmPao36acdrzCuE9nrHpym60gRP79TqouYpc3dazdxfOho_ubpxcTNomn6jvv_E5_u-o7sGdHpOSnU6J7sOaLjfhRlel8tsm3Jz38fcHsOzyek3v6COVIVdt47jDicXnpKksAK4I1mfBpM6ayLIgQw0Wu5ZcEqSnWHbJFAR9wGT_y7TGflaanitStzm6iOqHcLI3Pd6d-X3VBl_RiKa-DgOeZSGTKsgpM5EOJCukytPEGB5wqeKYZ0yyKNAMAVGotAUNspBGM6aZjh_BelmVegtIlqrIRCzLi7ywfauMWoUKAqNihkgo9uDt8PeE6inNsbLGpRiONnY2hZtND16Nolcdj8d1Qm-cCowScnmBF9_SRHxefBAHn97z8DBmYuHB9qAjorf5WoQYM8UoMPfg5fjaWiuGYGSpq9bKUG4xXWZXyb_KIE2-Re4ePO70b_wgi7csJItDO3KnRX8ei9id7riHJ_8u-gJuzY7nR-Jof3H4FG5HWPnD3dzZhvVm2epnFn81-XNnZj8AV9sobg |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB5Vrah44ShXoIBBCPGSVQ7HsSVeSrtLD7pCQEVfkOU4dlW1SlabRAJ-PZ5csKggxFukjC3bmbG_jGe-AXiBFHYRT9yfqtDap1RRX7iTxLeJTlQcZ8K2BKbHc7Z_Qg9Pk9M1eD3kwnT8EKPDDS2j3a_RwM0it79YuTZqEkYRppJv0ERwDOjb-_CTPAq56TqmPeqnXNCeVwjjeMamK6fRBi7s16ug5ipybY-e2U34Mgy6izi5mDR1NtHff-Nz_N9Z3YIbPSYlO50S3YY1U2zBta5K5bct2Dzu79_vwLLL67W9o4-UliyauuUOJw6fk7p0ALgkWJ8FkzorooqcDDVY3F5ySZCeYtklUxD0AZODs2mF_aw0PdekajJ0EVV34WQ2_bS77_dVG3xNI5r6JgwE5yFTOsgos5EJFMuVztLEWhEIpeNYcKZYFBiGgCjUxoEGlStrGDPMxPdgvSgL8wAIT3VkI8azPMtd35pTp1BBYHXMEAnFHrwavp7UPaU5Vta4lMOvjVtN2a6mB89H0UXH43GV0MtWBUYJtbzAwLc0kZ_nb-XhxzciPIqZnHuwPeiI7G2-kiHemeItsPDg2fjaWStewajClI2TocJhOu52yb_KIE2-Q-4e3O_0bxyQw1sOksWhm3mrRX-ei9yd7rQPD_9d9Clsvt-byXcH86NHcD3Cwh9t4M42rNfLxjx28KvOnrRW9gPIZify |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification+of+putative+new+tomato+allergens+and+differential+interaction+with+IgEs+of+tomato+allergic+subjects&rft.jtitle=Clinical+and+experimental+allergy&rft.au=Welter%2C+S.&rft.au=Lehmann%2C+K.&rft.au=D%C3%B6lle%2C+S.&rft.au=Schwarz%2C+D.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0954-7894&rft.eissn=1365-2222&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1419&rft.epage=1427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcea.12207&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_JSB91K36_N |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0954-7894&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0954-7894&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0954-7894&client=summon |