Identification of putative new tomato allergens and differential interaction with IgEs of tomato allergic subjects

Summary Background Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental allergy Vol. 43; no. 12; pp. 1419 - 1427
Main Authors Welter, S., Lehmann, K., Dölle, S., Schwarz, D., Weckwerth, W., Scheler, C., Worm, M., Franken, P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0954-7894
1365-2222
1365-2222
DOI10.1111/cea.12207

Cover

Abstract Summary Background Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. Objective This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Methods Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2‐D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. Results In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo‐β‐mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified.
AbstractList Summary Background Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. Objective This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Methods Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. Results In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo-[beta]-mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected.BACKGROUNDTomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected.This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions.OBJECTIVEThis study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions.Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests.METHODSProteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests.In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo-β-mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function.RESULTSIn total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo-β-mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function.The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified.CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCEThe hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified.
Summary Background Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. Objective This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Methods Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2‐D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. Results In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo‐β‐mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified.
Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo-β-mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified.
Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2-D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo- beta -mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified.
Author Weckwerth, W.
Welter, S.
Lehmann, K.
Dölle, S.
Schwarz, D.
Scheler, C.
Worm, M.
Franken, P.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: S.
  surname: Welter
  fullname: Welter, S.
  organization: Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Groβbeeren/Erfurt e.V., Großbeeren, Germany
– sequence: 2
  givenname: K.
  surname: Lehmann
  fullname: Lehmann, K.
  organization: Proteome Factory AG, Berlin, Germany
– sequence: 3
  givenname: S.
  surname: Dölle
  fullname: Dölle, S.
  organization: Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Allergy-Center-Charité, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
– sequence: 4
  givenname: D.
  surname: Schwarz
  fullname: Schwarz, D.
  organization: Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Groβbeeren/Erfurt e.V., Großbeeren, Germany
– sequence: 5
  givenname: W.
  surname: Weckwerth
  fullname: Weckwerth, W.
  organization: Department of Molecular Systems Biology, Faculty of Life Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
– sequence: 6
  givenname: C.
  surname: Scheler
  fullname: Scheler, C.
  organization: Proteome Factory AG, Berlin, Germany
– sequence: 7
  givenname: M.
  surname: Worm
  fullname: Worm, M.
  organization: Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Allergy-Center-Charité, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
– sequence: 8
  givenname: P.
  surname: Franken
  fullname: Franken, P.
  organization: Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Groβbeeren/Erfurt e.V., Großbeeren, Germany
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24118131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkc1uEzEUhS1URNOWBS-ALLGhi2ltz4x_liUKJVC1C6hYWo7nujhMPKntIe3bM_mrRAUSd-O7-L4jXZ8jdBC6AAi9oeSMDnNuwZxRxoh4gUa05HXBhjlAI6LqqhBSVYfoKKU5IaSslXyFDllFqaQlHaE4bSBk77w12XcBdw4v-zzsvwAHWOHcLUzusGlbiHcQEjahwY13DuLaMy32IUM0dmOvfP6Bp3eTtM75Q_UWp342B5vTCXrpTJvg9e49RrcfJ9_Gn4qrm8vp-OKqsBWrRAGUKCkpN5bMKu4YEMMbY2eidk4RZWxZKskNZwQ4IbyiFiSVpjEOOAcO5TF6v81dxu6-h5T1wicLbWsCdH3StFKMU6GU-h-UCCqFFAP67hk67_oYhkM0rZmqCRP1OvDtjupnC2j0MvqFiY96__EDcL4FbOxSiuC09XlTQY7Gt5oSva5WD9XqTbWDcfrM2If-jd2lr3wLj_8G9XhysTeKreFThocnw8SfmotS1Pr79aX-_PWDol9Krq_L313_wV8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1159_000434680
crossref_primary_10_1007_s15007_015_0942_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2014_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1111_cea_12442
crossref_primary_10_3233_HAB_180357
crossref_primary_10_1021_jf502292g
crossref_primary_10_1111_cea_13099
crossref_primary_10_1002_mnfr_201500782
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40629_015_0073_1
crossref_primary_10_3390_pathogens10010022
crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2022_7264
crossref_primary_10_1080_09540105_2023_2257398
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02364.x
10.1007/s002170100343
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60363-8
10.1067/mai.2003.173
10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283464c74
10.1159/000049526
10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.067
10.1023/A:1021206826750
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02795.x
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03167.x
10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03503.x
10.1021/pr100604x
10.1002/elps.11501601175
10.1007/s11883-009-0065-z
10.1016/S0301-0546(03)79162-9
10.1016/0168-9452(96)04420-2
10.1002/jsfa.4443
10.1104/pp.011890
10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833973fb
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01222.x
10.1007/s00572-010-0345-z
10.1159/000096114
10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01369.x
10.1007/s10493-006-9009-2
10.1002/mnfr.200400047
10.1016/j.anai.2010.11.022
10.1371/journal.pone.0017800
10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.027
10.1021/pr800186d
10.1371/journal.pone.0054755
10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00403.x
10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90078-2
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00895.x
10.1096/fj.10.163063
10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01186-8
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62834-7
10.1016/0091-6749(89)90083-3
10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00175.x
10.1371/journal.pone.0065116
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03841.x
10.1016/j.gene.2005.04.026
10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.008
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01703.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
H94
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1111/cea.12207
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Immunology Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Immunology Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Biology
EISSN 1365-2222
EndPage 1427
ExternalDocumentID 3317391181
24118131
10_1111_cea_12207
CEA12207
ark_67375_WNG_JSB91K36_N
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Ministries of Consumer Protection
– fundername: Food and Agriculture of the Federal Republic of Germany
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.55
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29B
31~
33P
36B
3O-
3SF
4.4
4P2
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
A8Z
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHEFC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
AOETA
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBB
EBC
EBD
EBS
EBX
EDH
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESTFP
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
X7M
XG1
YFH
YUY
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHHS
ACCFJ
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
WRC
WUP
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
H94
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4247-e1098816ac0b46f2e0a6dacb75ff909ac33986a620e600641ce818adafe66e6e3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0954-7894
1365-2222
IngestDate Mon Sep 08 06:51:55 EDT 2025
Mon Sep 08 10:30:36 EDT 2025
Mon Oct 06 17:41:49 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:37:29 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 03:33:13 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:13 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:55:19 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:17:27 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Keywords skin prick test
western blot
tomato allergy
immunoblot
tomato allergens
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4247-e1098816ac0b46f2e0a6dacb75ff909ac33986a620e600641ce818adafe66e6e3
Notes Food and Agriculture of the Federal Republic of Germany
ark:/67375/WNG-JSB91K36-N
Ministries of Consumer Protection
ArticleID:CEA12207
istex:07312409BCF6ACA872FFEB94EB821D88C1ED0278
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 24118131
PQID 1529502759
PQPubID 36521
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1492617999
proquest_miscellaneous_1490718787
proquest_journals_1529502759
pubmed_primary_24118131
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cea_12207
crossref_primary_10_1111_cea_12207
wiley_primary_10_1111_cea_12207_CEA12207
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_JSB91K36_N
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2013
  text: December 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Clinical and experimental allergy
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Exp Allergy
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Heinzerling L, Frew AJ, Bindslev-Jensen C et al. Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe - a survey from the GA(2)LEN network. Allergy 2005; 60:1287-300.
Cadot P, Diaz JF, Proost P et al. Purification and characterization of an 18-kd allergen of birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen: Identification as a cyclophilin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 105:286-91.
Nishino H, Murakoshi M, Ii T et al. Carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2002; 21:257-64.
Yamamoto N, Tsugane T, Watanabe M et al. Expressed sequence tags from the laboratory-grown miniature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivar Micro-Tom and mining for single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in tomato cultivars. Gene 2005; 356:127-34.
Kaulfuerst-Soboll H, Mertens M, Brehler R, von Schaewen A. Reduction of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in plant foodstuff: elucidation of clinical relevance and implications for allergy diagnosis. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17800.
Steckelbroeck S, Ballmer-Weber BK, Vieths S. Potential, pitfalls, and prospects of food allergy diagnostics with recombinant allergens or synthetic sequential epitopes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121:1323-30.
Niederberger V, Purohit A, Oster JP, Spitzauer S, Valenta R, Pauli G. The allergen profile of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: cross-reactivity with allergens from various plant species. Clin Exp Allergy 2002; 32:933-41.
Asero R. Tomato Allergy: Clinical Features and Usefulness of Current Routinely Available Diagnostic Methods. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2013; 23:37-42.
Schwarz D, Welter S, George E et al. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the allergenic potential of tomato. Mycorrhiza 2010; 21:341-9.
Dölle S, Schwarz D, Lehmann K et al. Tomato allergy: impact of genotype and environmental factors on the biological response. J Sci Food Agric 2011; 91:2234-40.
Geroldinger-Simic M, Zelniker T, Aberer W et al. Birch pollen-related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen-specific IgE and IgG(4) antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127:616-22.
Murakami S, Kondo Y, Nakano T, Sato F. Protease activity of CND41, a chloroplast nucleoid DNA-binding protein, isolated from cultured tobacco cells. FEBS Lett 2000; 468:15-8.
Asero R. Detection and clinical characterization of patients with oral allergy syndrome caused by stable allergens in Rosaceae and nuts. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999; 83:377-83.
Bassler OY, Weiss J, Wienkoop S et al. Evidence for novel tomato seed allergens: IgE-reactive Legumin and Vicilin proteins identified by multidimensional protein fractionation-mass spectrometry and in Silico Epitope modeling. J Proteome Res 2009; 8:1111-22.
Aina R, Asero R, Ghiani A, Marconi G, Albertini E, Citterio S. Exposure to cadmium-contaminated soils increases allergenicity of Poa annua L. pollen. Allergy 2010; 65:1313-21.
Mari A, Ooievaar-de Heer P, Scala E et al. Evaluation by double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge of the clinical relevance of IgE antibodies against plant glycans. Allergy 2008; 63:891-6.
Foetisch K, Westphal S, Lauer I et al. Biological activity of IgE specific for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111:889-96.
Klose J, Kobalz U. 2-Dimensional electrophoresis of proteins - an updated protocol and implications for a functional-analysis of the genome. Electrophoresis 1995; 16:1034-59.
Fromberg J. IgE as a marker in allergy and the role of IgE affinity. Allergy 2006; 61:1234.
Welter S, Dölle S, Lehmann K et al. Pepino mosaic virus infection of tomato affects allergen expression, but not the allergenic potential of fruits. PLoS One 2013; 8:e65116.
Altmann F. The role of protein glycosylation in allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007; 142:99-115.
Ballmer-Weber BK, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K. Molecular diagnosis of fruit and vegetable allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 11:229-35.
Dölle S, Lehmann K, Schwarz D et al. Allergenic activity of different tomato cultivars in tomato allergic subjects. Clin Exp Allergy 2011; 41:1643-52.
Lopez-Matas MA, Ferrer A, Larramendi CH et al. In vitro cross-reactivity between tomato and other plant allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009; 103:425-31.
Westphal S, Kolarich D, Foetisch K et al. Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (beta-fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato. Eur J Biochem 2003; 270:1327-37.
Katelaris CH. Food allergy and oral allergy or pollen-food syndrome. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 10:246-51.
Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S, Arcidiacono R, Fortunato D. Detection of a Novel Allergen in Raw Tomato. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2008; 18:397-400.
Pastorello EA, Robino AM. Clinical role of lipid transfer proteins in food allergy. Mol Nutr Food Res 2004; 48:356-62.
Riccioni G. Carotenoids and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2009; 11:434-9.
Zuberbier T, Edenharter G, Worm M et al. Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany - a population study. Allergy 2004; 59:338-45.
Armentia A, Callejo A, Diaz-Perales A, Martin-Gil FJ, Salcedo G. Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones. Allergol Immunopathol 2003; 31:44-6.
Foetisch K, Son DY, Altmann F et al. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) allergens in pollen-allergic patients. Eur Food Res Technol 2001; 213:259-66.
Bourgault R, Bewley JD. Variation in its C-terminal amino acids determines whether endo-beta-mannanase is active or inactive in ripening tomato fruits of different cultivars. Plant Physiol 2002; 130:1254-62.
Worm M, Edenharter G, Rueff F et al. Symptom profile and risk factors of anaphylaxis in Central Europe. Allergy 2012; 67:691-8.
Le LQ, Mahler V, Scheurer S et al. Yeast profilin complements profilin deficiency in transgenic tomato fruits and allows development of hypoallergenic tomato fruits. Faseb J 2010; 24:4939-47.
Le LQ, Lorenz Y, Scheurer S et al. Design of tomato fruits with reduced allergenicity by dsRNAi-mediated inhibition of ns-LTP (Lyc e 3) expression. Plant Biotechnol J 2006; 4:231-42.
Kondo Y, Urisu A, Tokuda R. Identification and characterization of the allergens in the tomato fruit by immunoblotting. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2001; 126:294-9.
Terefe NS, Gamage M, Vilkhu K, Simons L, Mawson R, Versteeg C. The kinetics of inactivation of pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonase in tomato juice by thermosonication. Food Chem 2009; 117:20-7.
Cardona G, Guisantes J, Eraso E, Serna LA, Martinez J. Enzymatic analysis of Blomia tropicalis and Blomia kulagini (Acari: Echimyopodidae) allergenic extracts obtained from different phases of culture growth. Exp Appl Acarol 2006; 39:281-8.
Asero R, Antonicelli L, Arena A et al. EpidemAAITO: Features of food allergy in Italian adults attending allergy clinics: a multi-centre study. Clin Exp Allergy 2009; 39:547-55.
Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello EA, Ansaloni R, Magri GC. Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with Fresh Foods and Commercial Food Extracts) and rast in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989; 83:683-90.
Singh B, Oellerich M, Kumar R et al. Immuno-reactive molecules identified from the secreted proteome of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Proteome Res 2010; 9:5517-29.
Sharma P, Gaur SN, Arora N. In silico Identification of IgE-Binding Epitopes of Osmotin Protein. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54755.
Lopez-Matas M, Larramendi C, Ferrer A et al. Identification and quantification of tomato allergens: in vitro characterization of six different varieties. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 106:230-8.
Abad LR, Durzo MP, Liu D et al. Antifungal activity of tobacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization. Plant Sci 1996; 118:11-23.
2010; 10
1989; 83
1995; 16
2002; 130
2013; 23
2005; 356
2008; 18
2006; 39
2004; 48
2002; 32
2007; 142
2011; 11
2003; 270
2006; 4
2005; 60
1999; 83
2013; 8
2011; 6
2008; 121
2003; 31
2001; 126
2003; 111
2009; 117
2011; 127
2009; 11
2010; 21
2010; 65
2006; 61
2010; 24
2011; 106
2011; 91
2000; 468
2000; 105
2004; 59
2002; 21
2011; 41
2009; 8
2008; 63
2012; 67
2009; 103
2001; 213
1996; 118
2010; 9
2009; 39
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
Asero R (e_1_2_7_40_1) 2013; 23
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_41_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_42_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_43_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_44_1
e_1_2_7_45_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_46_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
Armentia A (e_1_2_7_11_1) 2003; 31
Asero R (e_1_2_7_38_1) 2008; 18
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_32_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_33_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_34_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_35_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
e_1_2_7_36_1
e_1_2_7_37_1
e_1_2_7_39_1
References_xml – reference: Kaulfuerst-Soboll H, Mertens M, Brehler R, von Schaewen A. Reduction of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in plant foodstuff: elucidation of clinical relevance and implications for allergy diagnosis. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17800.
– reference: Welter S, Dölle S, Lehmann K et al. Pepino mosaic virus infection of tomato affects allergen expression, but not the allergenic potential of fruits. PLoS One 2013; 8:e65116.
– reference: Katelaris CH. Food allergy and oral allergy or pollen-food syndrome. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 10:246-51.
– reference: Terefe NS, Gamage M, Vilkhu K, Simons L, Mawson R, Versteeg C. The kinetics of inactivation of pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonase in tomato juice by thermosonication. Food Chem 2009; 117:20-7.
– reference: Altmann F. The role of protein glycosylation in allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007; 142:99-115.
– reference: Riccioni G. Carotenoids and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2009; 11:434-9.
– reference: Lopez-Matas M, Larramendi C, Ferrer A et al. Identification and quantification of tomato allergens: in vitro characterization of six different varieties. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 106:230-8.
– reference: Asero R, Antonicelli L, Arena A et al. EpidemAAITO: Features of food allergy in Italian adults attending allergy clinics: a multi-centre study. Clin Exp Allergy 2009; 39:547-55.
– reference: Fromberg J. IgE as a marker in allergy and the role of IgE affinity. Allergy 2006; 61:1234.
– reference: Yamamoto N, Tsugane T, Watanabe M et al. Expressed sequence tags from the laboratory-grown miniature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivar Micro-Tom and mining for single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in tomato cultivars. Gene 2005; 356:127-34.
– reference: Cadot P, Diaz JF, Proost P et al. Purification and characterization of an 18-kd allergen of birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen: Identification as a cyclophilin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 105:286-91.
– reference: Nishino H, Murakoshi M, Ii T et al. Carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2002; 21:257-64.
– reference: Pastorello EA, Robino AM. Clinical role of lipid transfer proteins in food allergy. Mol Nutr Food Res 2004; 48:356-62.
– reference: Zuberbier T, Edenharter G, Worm M et al. Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany - a population study. Allergy 2004; 59:338-45.
– reference: Asero R. Detection and clinical characterization of patients with oral allergy syndrome caused by stable allergens in Rosaceae and nuts. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999; 83:377-83.
– reference: Geroldinger-Simic M, Zelniker T, Aberer W et al. Birch pollen-related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen-specific IgE and IgG(4) antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127:616-22.
– reference: Klose J, Kobalz U. 2-Dimensional electrophoresis of proteins - an updated protocol and implications for a functional-analysis of the genome. Electrophoresis 1995; 16:1034-59.
– reference: Bourgault R, Bewley JD. Variation in its C-terminal amino acids determines whether endo-beta-mannanase is active or inactive in ripening tomato fruits of different cultivars. Plant Physiol 2002; 130:1254-62.
– reference: Le LQ, Mahler V, Scheurer S et al. Yeast profilin complements profilin deficiency in transgenic tomato fruits and allows development of hypoallergenic tomato fruits. Faseb J 2010; 24:4939-47.
– reference: Le LQ, Lorenz Y, Scheurer S et al. Design of tomato fruits with reduced allergenicity by dsRNAi-mediated inhibition of ns-LTP (Lyc e 3) expression. Plant Biotechnol J 2006; 4:231-42.
– reference: Lopez-Matas MA, Ferrer A, Larramendi CH et al. In vitro cross-reactivity between tomato and other plant allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009; 103:425-31.
– reference: Niederberger V, Purohit A, Oster JP, Spitzauer S, Valenta R, Pauli G. The allergen profile of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: cross-reactivity with allergens from various plant species. Clin Exp Allergy 2002; 32:933-41.
– reference: Mari A, Ooievaar-de Heer P, Scala E et al. Evaluation by double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge of the clinical relevance of IgE antibodies against plant glycans. Allergy 2008; 63:891-6.
– reference: Foetisch K, Westphal S, Lauer I et al. Biological activity of IgE specific for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111:889-96.
– reference: Foetisch K, Son DY, Altmann F et al. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) allergens in pollen-allergic patients. Eur Food Res Technol 2001; 213:259-66.
– reference: Sharma P, Gaur SN, Arora N. In silico Identification of IgE-Binding Epitopes of Osmotin Protein. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54755.
– reference: Kondo Y, Urisu A, Tokuda R. Identification and characterization of the allergens in the tomato fruit by immunoblotting. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2001; 126:294-9.
– reference: Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S, Arcidiacono R, Fortunato D. Detection of a Novel Allergen in Raw Tomato. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2008; 18:397-400.
– reference: Worm M, Edenharter G, Rueff F et al. Symptom profile and risk factors of anaphylaxis in Central Europe. Allergy 2012; 67:691-8.
– reference: Bassler OY, Weiss J, Wienkoop S et al. Evidence for novel tomato seed allergens: IgE-reactive Legumin and Vicilin proteins identified by multidimensional protein fractionation-mass spectrometry and in Silico Epitope modeling. J Proteome Res 2009; 8:1111-22.
– reference: Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello EA, Ansaloni R, Magri GC. Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with Fresh Foods and Commercial Food Extracts) and rast in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989; 83:683-90.
– reference: Westphal S, Kolarich D, Foetisch K et al. Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (beta-fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato. Eur J Biochem 2003; 270:1327-37.
– reference: Dölle S, Lehmann K, Schwarz D et al. Allergenic activity of different tomato cultivars in tomato allergic subjects. Clin Exp Allergy 2011; 41:1643-52.
– reference: Heinzerling L, Frew AJ, Bindslev-Jensen C et al. Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe - a survey from the GA(2)LEN network. Allergy 2005; 60:1287-300.
– reference: Murakami S, Kondo Y, Nakano T, Sato F. Protease activity of CND41, a chloroplast nucleoid DNA-binding protein, isolated from cultured tobacco cells. FEBS Lett 2000; 468:15-8.
– reference: Asero R. Tomato Allergy: Clinical Features and Usefulness of Current Routinely Available Diagnostic Methods. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2013; 23:37-42.
– reference: Ballmer-Weber BK, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K. Molecular diagnosis of fruit and vegetable allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 11:229-35.
– reference: Abad LR, Durzo MP, Liu D et al. Antifungal activity of tobacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization. Plant Sci 1996; 118:11-23.
– reference: Steckelbroeck S, Ballmer-Weber BK, Vieths S. Potential, pitfalls, and prospects of food allergy diagnostics with recombinant allergens or synthetic sequential epitopes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121:1323-30.
– reference: Dölle S, Schwarz D, Lehmann K et al. Tomato allergy: impact of genotype and environmental factors on the biological response. J Sci Food Agric 2011; 91:2234-40.
– reference: Singh B, Oellerich M, Kumar R et al. Immuno-reactive molecules identified from the secreted proteome of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Proteome Res 2010; 9:5517-29.
– reference: Schwarz D, Welter S, George E et al. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the allergenic potential of tomato. Mycorrhiza 2010; 21:341-9.
– reference: Aina R, Asero R, Ghiani A, Marconi G, Albertini E, Citterio S. Exposure to cadmium-contaminated soils increases allergenicity of Poa annua L. pollen. Allergy 2010; 65:1313-21.
– reference: Cardona G, Guisantes J, Eraso E, Serna LA, Martinez J. Enzymatic analysis of Blomia tropicalis and Blomia kulagini (Acari: Echimyopodidae) allergenic extracts obtained from different phases of culture growth. Exp Appl Acarol 2006; 39:281-8.
– reference: Armentia A, Callejo A, Diaz-Perales A, Martin-Gil FJ, Salcedo G. Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones. Allergol Immunopathol 2003; 31:44-6.
– volume: 91
  start-page: 2234
  year: 2011
  end-page: 40
  article-title: Tomato allergy: impact of genotype and environmental factors on the biological response
  publication-title: J Sci Food Agric
– volume: 67
  start-page: 691
  year: 2012
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Symptom profile and risk factors of anaphylaxis in Central Europe
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2009
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Evidence for novel tomato seed allergens: IgE‐reactive Legumin and Vicilin proteins identified by multidimensional protein fractionation‐mass spectrometry and in Silico Epitope modeling
  publication-title: J Proteome Res
– volume: 142
  start-page: 99
  year: 2007
  end-page: 115
  article-title: The role of protein glycosylation in allergy
  publication-title: Int Arch Allergy Immunol
– volume: 11
  start-page: 229
  year: 2011
  end-page: 35
  article-title: Molecular diagnosis of fruit and vegetable allergy
  publication-title: Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 106
  start-page: 230
  year: 2011
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Identification and quantification of tomato allergens: in vitro characterization of six different varieties
  publication-title: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
– volume: 32
  start-page: 933
  year: 2002
  end-page: 41
  article-title: The allergen profile of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen: cross‐reactivity with allergens from various plant species
  publication-title: Clin Exp Allergy
– volume: 8
  start-page: e54755
  year: 2013
  article-title: In silico Identification of IgE‐Binding Epitopes of Osmotin Protein
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 24
  start-page: 4939
  year: 2010
  end-page: 47
  article-title: Yeast profilin complements profilin deficiency in transgenic tomato fruits and allows development of hypoallergenic tomato fruits
  publication-title: Faseb J
– volume: 18
  start-page: 397
  year: 2008
  end-page: 400
  article-title: Detection of a Novel Allergen in Raw Tomato
  publication-title: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol
– volume: 270
  start-page: 1327
  year: 2003
  end-page: 37
  article-title: Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (beta‐fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato
  publication-title: Eur J Biochem
– volume: 39
  start-page: 281
  year: 2006
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Enzymatic analysis of Blomia tropicalis and Blomia kulagini (Acari: Echimyopodidae) allergenic extracts obtained from different phases of culture growth
  publication-title: Exp Appl Acarol
– volume: 105
  start-page: 286
  year: 2000
  end-page: 91
  article-title: Purification and characterization of an 18‐kd allergen of birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen: Identification as a cyclophilin
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 257
  year: 2002
  end-page: 64
  article-title: Carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention
  publication-title: Cancer Metastasis Rev
– volume: 356
  start-page: 127
  year: 2005
  end-page: 34
  article-title: Expressed sequence tags from the laboratory‐grown miniature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivar Micro‐Tom and mining for single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in tomato cultivars
  publication-title: Gene
– volume: 83
  start-page: 683
  year: 1989
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with Fresh Foods and Commercial Food Extracts) and rast in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 341
  year: 2010
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the allergenic potential of tomato
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
– volume: 130
  start-page: 1254
  year: 2002
  end-page: 62
  article-title: Variation in its C‐terminal amino acids determines whether endo‐beta‐mannanase is active or inactive in ripening tomato fruits of different cultivars
  publication-title: Plant Physiol
– volume: 39
  start-page: 547
  year: 2009
  end-page: 55
  article-title: EpidemAAITO: Features of food allergy in Italian adults attending allergy clinics: a multi‐centre study
  publication-title: Clin Exp Allergy
– volume: 59
  start-page: 338
  year: 2004
  end-page: 45
  article-title: Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany – a population study
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 127
  start-page: 616
  year: 2011
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Birch pollen‐related food allergy: clinical aspects and the role of allergen‐specific IgE and IgG(4) antibodies
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 83
  start-page: 377
  year: 1999
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Detection and clinical characterization of patients with oral allergy syndrome caused by stable allergens in Rosaceae and nuts
  publication-title: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
– volume: 468
  start-page: 15
  year: 2000
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Protease activity of CND41, a chloroplast nucleoid DNA‐binding protein, isolated from cultured tobacco cells
  publication-title: FEBS Lett
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1034
  year: 1995
  end-page: 59
  article-title: 2‐Dimensional electrophoresis of proteins – an updated protocol and implications for a functional‐analysis of the genome
  publication-title: Electrophoresis
– volume: 63
  start-page: 891
  year: 2008
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Evaluation by double‐blind placebo‐controlled oral challenge of the clinical relevance of IgE antibodies against plant glycans
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 48
  start-page: 356
  year: 2004
  end-page: 62
  article-title: Clinical role of lipid transfer proteins in food allergy
  publication-title: Mol Nutr Food Res
– volume: 213
  start-page: 259
  year: 2001
  end-page: 66
  article-title: Tomato ( ) allergens in pollen‐allergic patients
  publication-title: Eur Food Res Technol
– volume: 6
  start-page: e17800
  year: 2011
  article-title: Reduction of cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants in plant foodstuff: elucidation of clinical relevance and implications for allergy diagnosis
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 11
  start-page: 434
  year: 2009
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Carotenoids and cardiovascular disease
  publication-title: Curr Atheroscler Rep
– volume: 10
  start-page: 246
  year: 2010
  end-page: 51
  article-title: Food allergy and oral allergy or pollen‐food syndrome
  publication-title: Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 103
  start-page: 425
  year: 2009
  end-page: 31
  article-title: In vitro cross‐reactivity between tomato and other plant allergens
  publication-title: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
– volume: 4
  start-page: 231
  year: 2006
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Design of tomato fruits with reduced allergenicity by dsRNAi‐mediated inhibition of ns‐LTP (Lyc e 3) expression
  publication-title: Plant Biotechnol J
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1313
  year: 2010
  end-page: 21
  article-title: Exposure to cadmium‐contaminated soils increases allergenicity of Poa annua L. pollen
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1234
  year: 2006
  article-title: IgE as a marker in allergy and the role of IgE affinity
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 118
  start-page: 11
  year: 1996
  end-page: 23
  article-title: Antifungal activity of tobacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization
  publication-title: Plant Sci
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1287
  year: 2005
  end-page: 300
  article-title: Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe – a survey from the GA(2)LEN network
  publication-title: Allergy
– volume: 117
  start-page: 20
  year: 2009
  end-page: 7
  article-title: The kinetics of inactivation of pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonase in tomato juice by thermosonication
  publication-title: Food Chem
– volume: 126
  start-page: 294
  year: 2001
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Identification and characterization of the allergens in the tomato fruit by immunoblotting
  publication-title: Int Arch Allergy Immunol
– volume: 111
  start-page: 889
  year: 2003
  end-page: 96
  article-title: Biological activity of IgE specific for cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– volume: 8
  start-page: e65116
  year: 2013
  article-title: Pepino mosaic virus infection of tomato affects allergen expression, but not the allergenic potential of fruits
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 9
  start-page: 5517
  year: 2010
  end-page: 29
  article-title: Immuno‐reactive molecules identified from the secreted proteome of
  publication-title: J Proteome Res
– volume: 23
  start-page: 37
  year: 2013
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Tomato Allergy: Clinical Features and Usefulness of Current Routinely Available Diagnostic Methods
  publication-title: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1643
  year: 2011
  end-page: 52
  article-title: Allergenic activity of different tomato cultivars in tomato allergic subjects
  publication-title: Clin Exp Allergy
– volume: 31
  start-page: 44
  year: 2003
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones
  publication-title: Allergol Immunopathol
– volume: 121
  start-page: 1323
  year: 2008
  end-page: 30
  article-title: Potential, pitfalls, and prospects of food allergy diagnostics with recombinant allergens or synthetic sequential epitopes
  publication-title: J Allergy Clin Immunol
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02364.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/s002170100343
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60363-8
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.173
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283464c74
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1159/000049526
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.067
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1021206826750
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02795.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_39_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03167.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_41_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03503.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1021/pr100604x
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1002/elps.11501601175
– volume: 18
  start-page: 397
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_7_38_1
  article-title: Detection of a Novel Allergen in Raw Tomato
  publication-title: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11883-009-0065-z
– volume: 31
  start-page: 44
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  article-title: Enhancement of tomato allergenicity after treatment with plant hormones
  publication-title: Allergol Immunopathol
  doi: 10.1016/S0301-0546(03)79162-9
– ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
  doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(96)04420-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4443
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1104/pp.011890
– ident: e_1_2_7_37_1
  doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833973fb
– ident: e_1_2_7_45_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01222.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0345-z
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1159/000096114
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01369.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10493-006-9009-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
  doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200400047
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.11.022
– ident: e_1_2_7_42_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017800
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.027
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1021/pr800186d
– ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054755
– volume: 23
  start-page: 37
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_7_40_1
  article-title: Tomato Allergy: Clinical Features and Usefulness of Current Routinely Available Diagnostic Methods
  publication-title: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00403.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_43_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90078-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00895.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1096/fj.10.163063
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01186-8
– ident: e_1_2_7_46_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62834-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90083-3
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00175.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065116
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03841.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.04.026
– ident: e_1_2_7_44_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.008
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01703.x
SSID ssj0003598
Score 2.162101
Snippet Summary Background Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting...
Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As...
Summary Background Tomato became one of the world-wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1419
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Allergens - immunology
Allergens - metabolism
Allergies
Antigens, Plant - immunology
Antigens, Plant - metabolism
Female
Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis
Food Hypersensitivity - immunology
Food Hypersensitivity - metabolism
Humans
Hypotheses
immunoblot
Immunoglobulin E - immunology
Immunoglobulin E - metabolism
Lycopersicon esculentum
Lycopersicon esculentum - adverse effects
Male
Plant Proteins - immunology
Plant Proteins - metabolism
Proteomics - methods
skin prick test
Skin Tests
tomato allergens
tomato allergy
western blot
Young Adult
Title Identification of putative new tomato allergens and differential interaction with IgEs of tomato allergic subjects
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-JSB91K36-N/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcea.12207
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24118131
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1529502759
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1490718787
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1492617999
Volume 43
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  eissn: 1365-2222
  dateEnd: 20241028
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003598
  issn: 0954-7894
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 19890101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 0954-7894
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  eissn: 1365-2222
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003598
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Ra9YwED_GhuKLm1Nn55QoIr70o23StGFPc3xzTvY9qMM9CCVNE5GNdnxtYfrXm0va6idTxLdCL6FJ75Jfcne_A3iBFHZJntqTqlAqZEyyUNidJDSpSiWlpTCOwPR0wY_P2Ml5er4G-2MujOeHmC7c0DLceo0GLsv2FyNXWs7iJHGZ5DHl7jj1_id1FDLTeZ49Fma5YAOrEEbxTC1X9qINnNbrm4DmKm51G8_RJnweP9nHm1zM-q6cqe-_sTn-55i24O4ASMmB16B7sKbrbbjlS1R-24bbp4Pz_T4sfVKvGW75SGPIVd854nBiwTnpGot-G4LFWTCjsyWyrshYgMUuJJcEuSmWPpOC4AUweftl3mI_K02_KtL2Jd4PtQ_g7Gj-8fA4HEo2hIolLAt1HIk8j7lUUcm4SXQkeSVVmaXGiEhIRanIueRJpDmioVhpixhkJY3mXHNNH8J63dT6EZA8U4lJeF5WZWX7Vjmz2hRFRlGOMIgG8Gr8eYUa-MyxrMZlMZ5r7GwWbjYDeD6JXnkSj5uEXjoNmCTk8gKj3rK0-LR4U5x8eC3id5QXiwD2RhUpBoNvixgdpugCFgE8m15bU0X_i6x101sZJiygy-0S-VcZ5Mi3sD2AHa9-0wdZsGXxGI3tyJ0S_XksxeH8wD3s_rvoY7iTYKkPF6qzB-vdstdPLODqyqfOsn4AFSIkTQ
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB5VrTheOMrRQAGDEOIlqxyOE0u8lGrL9th9gFb0pbIcx0ZVq6TaJBLw6_E4BywqCPEWKWMrdmbszzOebwBeI4VdlCX2pMqV8imV1Od2J_FNohIZxzk3jsB0vmCzE3pwmpyuwbshF6bjhxgdbmgZbr1GA0eH9C9WrrSchFGEqeQblNlzCkKijz_Jo5CbrmPao36acdrzCuE9nrHpym60gRP79TqouYpc3dazdxfOho_ubpxcTNomn6jvv_E5_u-o7sGdHpOSnU6J7sOaLjfhRlel8tsm3Jz38fcHsOzyek3v6COVIVdt47jDicXnpKksAK4I1mfBpM6ayLIgQw0Wu5ZcEqSnWHbJFAR9wGT_y7TGflaanitStzm6iOqHcLI3Pd6d-X3VBl_RiKa-DgOeZSGTKsgpM5EOJCukytPEGB5wqeKYZ0yyKNAMAVGotAUNspBGM6aZjh_BelmVegtIlqrIRCzLi7ywfauMWoUKAqNihkgo9uDt8PeE6inNsbLGpRiONnY2hZtND16Nolcdj8d1Qm-cCowScnmBF9_SRHxefBAHn97z8DBmYuHB9qAjorf5WoQYM8UoMPfg5fjaWiuGYGSpq9bKUG4xXWZXyb_KIE2-Re4ePO70b_wgi7csJItDO3KnRX8ei9id7riHJ_8u-gJuzY7nR-Jof3H4FG5HWPnD3dzZhvVm2epnFn81-XNnZj8AV9sobg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB5Vrah44ShXoIBBCPGSVQ7HsSVeSrtLD7pCQEVfkOU4dlW1SlabRAJ-PZ5csKggxFukjC3bmbG_jGe-AXiBFHYRT9yfqtDap1RRX7iTxLeJTlQcZ8K2BKbHc7Z_Qg9Pk9M1eD3kwnT8EKPDDS2j3a_RwM0it79YuTZqEkYRppJv0ERwDOjb-_CTPAq56TqmPeqnXNCeVwjjeMamK6fRBi7s16ug5ipybY-e2U34Mgy6izi5mDR1NtHff-Nz_N9Z3YIbPSYlO50S3YY1U2zBta5K5bct2Dzu79_vwLLL67W9o4-UliyauuUOJw6fk7p0ALgkWJ8FkzorooqcDDVY3F5ySZCeYtklUxD0AZODs2mF_aw0PdekajJ0EVV34WQ2_bS77_dVG3xNI5r6JgwE5yFTOsgos5EJFMuVztLEWhEIpeNYcKZYFBiGgCjUxoEGlStrGDPMxPdgvSgL8wAIT3VkI8azPMtd35pTp1BBYHXMEAnFHrwavp7UPaU5Vta4lMOvjVtN2a6mB89H0UXH43GV0MtWBUYJtbzAwLc0kZ_nb-XhxzciPIqZnHuwPeiI7G2-kiHemeItsPDg2fjaWStewajClI2TocJhOu52yb_KIE2-Q-4e3O_0bxyQw1sOksWhm3mrRX-ei9yd7rQPD_9d9Clsvt-byXcH86NHcD3Cwh9t4M42rNfLxjx28KvOnrRW9gPIZify
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification+of+putative+new+tomato+allergens+and+differential+interaction+with+IgEs+of+tomato+allergic+subjects&rft.jtitle=Clinical+and+experimental+allergy&rft.au=Welter%2C+S.&rft.au=Lehmann%2C+K.&rft.au=D%C3%B6lle%2C+S.&rft.au=Schwarz%2C+D.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0954-7894&rft.eissn=1365-2222&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1419&rft.epage=1427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcea.12207&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_JSB91K36_N
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0954-7894&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0954-7894&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0954-7894&client=summon