Identification of putative new tomato allergens and differential interaction with IgEs of tomato allergic subjects

Summary Background Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental allergy Vol. 43; no. 12; pp. 1419 - 1427
Main Authors Welter, S., Lehmann, K., Dölle, S., Schwarz, D., Weckwerth, W., Scheler, C., Worm, M., Franken, P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0954-7894
1365-2222
1365-2222
DOI10.1111/cea.12207

Cover

More Information
Summary:Summary Background Tomato became one of the world‐wide most consumed vegetables, unfortunately accompanied by an increasing risk of tomato allergy affecting certain people. As tomato allergic subjects show highly variable reactions in clinical allergy tests, it is difficult to identify cultivars or differentially treated tomato plants where a significant reduction in the allergenic potential over all subjects of a cohort can be detected. Objective This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that individual variability is based on differential reactions of single subjects to particular allergens in tomato fruits of plants with certain genetic background or cultivated under distinct conditions. Methods Proteins were extracted from tomato fruits of the previously investigated genotypes 76R, its mycorrhizal mutant RMC, and the cultivar Counter, fertilized with different forms of nitrogen in deficit or excess. 2‐D immunoblots were carried out with sera of nine tomato allergic subjects, beforehand analysed in skin prick tests. Results In total, ten putative tomato allergens were identified in these immunoblots. No correlation was detected between individual skin prick test results and the quantity of positive reactions to putative allergens. IgEs of each subject showed reactions to nearly every identified putative allergen, but reactions were dependent on genotype and growth conditions. Among the ten putative tomato allergens, five new candidates were identified as follows: an endo‐β‐mannanase, a pectinacetylesterase, a pectinesterase inhibitor, an aspartyl protease family protein and a protein of unknown function. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance The hypothesis that high interindividual differences in allergic reactions are based on the interactions between the IgEs of allergic subjects with particular allergens has to be rejected. However, five proteins with putative clinical relevance as tomato allergens could be newly identified.
Bibliography:Food and Agriculture of the Federal Republic of Germany
ark:/67375/WNG-JSB91K36-N
Ministries of Consumer Protection
ArticleID:CEA12207
istex:07312409BCF6ACA872FFEB94EB821D88C1ED0278
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0954-7894
1365-2222
1365-2222
DOI:10.1111/cea.12207