Mental Causation for Standard Dualists
The standard objection to dualist theories of mind is that they seemingly cannot account for the obvious fact that mental phenomena cause our behaviour. On the plausible assumption that all our behaviour is physically necessitated by entirely physical phenomena, there appears to be no room for duali...
Saved in:
Published in | Australasian journal of philosophy Vol. 102; no. 4; pp. 978 - 998 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Routledge
01.10.2024
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0004-8402 1471-6828 1471-6828 |
DOI | 10.1080/00048402.2024.2335325 |
Cover
Summary: | The standard objection to dualist theories of mind is that they seemingly cannot account for the obvious fact that mental phenomena cause our behaviour. On the plausible assumption that all our behaviour is physically necessitated by entirely physical phenomena, there appears to be no room for dualist mental causation. Some argue that dualists can address this problem by making minimal adjustments in their ontology. I argue that no such adjustments are required. Given recent developments in philosophy of causation, it is plausible that mental phenomena cause behaviour in standard dualist ontologies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0004-8402 1471-6828 1471-6828 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00048402.2024.2335325 |