Validation for a tropical belt version of WRF: sensitivity tests on radiation and cumulus convection parameterizations

• Published in: Atmospheric and oceanic science letters = Daqi-he-haiyang-kexue-kuaibao Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 192 - 200
• Main Authors: SUN, Bi-Yun, BI, Xun-Qiang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis 04.05.2019; KeAi Communications Co., Ltd
• Subjects: cumulus convection parameterization; diurnal cycle of precipitation; radiation scheme; WRF model; WRF 模式，积云对流参数化方案，辐射参数化方案，降水日变化
• ISSN: 1674-2834; 2376-6123; 2376-6123
• DOI: 10.1080/16742834.2019.1590118

Version 3.9 of WRF-ARW is run with a tropical belt configuration for a period from 2012 to 2016 in this study. The domain covers the entire tropics between 45°S and 45°N with a spatial resolution of about 45 km. In order to verify two radiation schemes and four cumulus convection schemes, eight experiments are performed with different combinations of physics parameterization schemes. The results show that eight experiments present reasonable spatial patterns of surface air temperature and precipitation in boreal summer, with the spatial correlation coefficient (COR) between simulated and observed temperature exceeding 0.95, and that between simulated and observed precipitation ranges from 0.65 to 0.82. The four experiments with the RRTMG radiation scheme show a better performance than the other four experiments with the CAM radiation scheme. In the four experiments with the RRTMG radiation scheme, the COR between simulated and observed surface air temperature is about 0.98, and that between simulated and observed precipitation ranges from 0.76 to 0.82. Comparatively, the two experiments using the new Tiedtke cumulus parameterization scheme can simulate better diurnal variation of precipitation in boreal summer than the other six experiments. In particular, for the diurnal cycle of precipitation over land and ocean, the experiment using the RRTMG radiation scheme and the new Tiedtke cumulus convection scheme shows that the peaks of precipitation rate appear at 0400 LST and 1600 LST, in agreement with observation.