Endovascular Treatment of Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke
Approximately one-third of acute ischemic strokes with an identifiable vessel occlusion are caused by medium vessel occlusion (MeVO), that is, nonlarge vessel occlusions that are potentially amenable to endovascular treatment (EVT). Management of patients with MeVO is challenging in many ways: detec...
Saved in:
Published in | Stroke (1970) Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 769 - 778 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hagerstown, MD
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
01.03.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0039-2499 1524-4628 1524-4628 |
DOI | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.036942 |
Cover
Summary: | Approximately one-third of acute ischemic strokes with an identifiable vessel occlusion are caused by medium vessel occlusion (MeVO), that is, nonlarge vessel occlusions that are potentially amenable to endovascular treatment (EVT). Management of patients with MeVO is challenging in many ways: detecting MeVOs can be challenging, particularly for inexperienced physicians, and in busy clinical routine, MeVOs, therefore, remain sometimes undiagnosed. While the clinical course of MeVO stroke with medical management, including intravenous thrombolysis, is by no means, benign, it is more favorable compared with large vessel occlusion. At the same time, EVT complication rates are higher, and thus, the marginal benefit of EVT beyond best medical management is expected to be smaller and more challenging to detect if it were present. Several randomized controlled trials are currently underway to investigate whether and to what degree patients with MeVO may benefit from EVT and will soon provide robust data for evidence-based MeVO EVT decision-making. In this review, we discuss different ways of defining MeVOs, strategies to optimize MeVO detection on imaging, and considerations for EVT decision-making in the setting of MeVO stroke. We discuss the technical challenges related to MeVO EVT and conclude with an overview of currently ongoing MeVO EVT trials. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 776. Supplemental Material is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.036942. Correspondence to: Mayank Goyal, MD, PhD, Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, 1403 29th St. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada. Email mgoyal@ucalgary.ca ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0039-2499 1524-4628 1524-4628 |
DOI: | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.036942 |