Unilateral vs bilateral neck irradiation: The importance of careful patient selection in tailoring radiation therapy for lateralized palatine-tonsil and non-palatine-tonsil oropharyngeal carcinoma
•Unilateral neck radiotherapy is controversial for lateralized oropharyngeal cancer.•This matched analysis supports its safety in well-selected patients.•Unilateral radiotherapy reduces treatment-related toxicities.•Non-tonsillar tumors may also be eligible for unilateral radiotherapy. Unilateral vs...
Saved in:
Published in | Radiotherapy and oncology Vol. 210; p. 111049 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ireland
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0167-8140 1879-0887 1879-0887 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111049 |
Cover
Summary: | •Unilateral neck radiotherapy is controversial for lateralized oropharyngeal cancer.•This matched analysis supports its safety in well-selected patients.•Unilateral radiotherapy reduces treatment-related toxicities.•Non-tonsillar tumors may also be eligible for unilateral radiotherapy.
Unilateral vs Bilateral Neck Irradiation: The Importance of Careful Patient Selection in Tailoring Radiation Therapy for Lateralized Palatine-Tonsil and Non-Palatine-Tonsil Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.
To compare oncologic outcomes of well-lateralized oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) following unilateral vs bilateral neck radiotherapy (RT).
Patients with cT1-3 N0-2bM0 (TNM-7) OPC, treated with curative (chemo)RT in two institutions (2008–2019) were identified. For palatine tonsil tumor, unilateral neck RT was considered for tumor not invading beyond 1 cm of the tongue base or the soft palate without deep penetration. Unilateral neck RT was also considered for well-lateralized non-palatine tonsil tumor (i.e. base of tongue, soft palate or vallecula) within 1 cm of the lateral part of the mucosal corresponding oropharyngeal subsite without deep penetration. One-to-one propensity score-matched cohort of patients treated with unilateral vs bilateral neck RT was created according to patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The primary outcome was contralateral-only nodal failure (CNF, i.e., without local or ipsilateral regional failure). Secondary outcomes included local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
346 patients were selected for the matched cohort (173 in each group), including 46 non-palatine tonsil tumors. The median follow-up was 5.1 years. The 5-year CNF, LF, RF, DM, DFS and OS for unilateral vs bilateral neck RT groups were 1 % (95 % CI: 0 %-3%) vs 0 %, 5 % (95 % CI: 3 %-10 %) vs 2 % (95 % CI: 0 %-5%), 4 % (95 % CI: 2 %-8%) vs 4 % (95 % CI: 2 %-8%), 5 % (95 % CI: 3 %-10 %) vs 6 % (95 % CI: 3 %-10 %), 80 % (95 % CI: 74 %-87 %) vs 79 % (95 % CI: 73 %-86 %), and 85 % (95 % CI: 80 %-91 %) vs 83 % (95 % CI: 78 %-90 %), respectively (p > 0.05 for all). One patient in the unilateral neck RT group had CNF after RT (cT2N2bM0 tonsillar cancer, successfully salvaged).
Careful selection of well-lateralized OPC to receive unilateral neck RT results in favourable oncologic outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111049 |