Unilateral vs bilateral neck irradiation: The importance of careful patient selection in tailoring radiation therapy for lateralized palatine-tonsil and non-palatine-tonsil oropharyngeal carcinoma

•Unilateral neck radiotherapy is controversial for lateralized oropharyngeal cancer.•This matched analysis supports its safety in well-selected patients.•Unilateral radiotherapy reduces treatment-related toxicities.•Non-tonsillar tumors may also be eligible for unilateral radiotherapy. Unilateral vs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiotherapy and oncology Vol. 210; p. 111049
Main Authors Gau, Max, Alfaraj, Fatimah A., Huang, Shao Hui, O’Sullivan, Brian, Su, Jie, Xu, Wei, Hamilton, Sarah N., Maletta, Anthony, Salman, Omar, McInerney, Mary, Javed, Abiha, Sanz-Garcia, Enrique, Bratman, Scott, Hahn, Ezra, Hope, Andrew, Kim, John J., Malik, Nauman, McPartlin, Andrew, Tsai, C. Jillian, Waldron, John, Yao, Christopher M.K.L., de Almeida, John R., Hosni, Ali
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.09.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0167-8140
1879-0887
1879-0887
DOI10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111049

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Unilateral neck radiotherapy is controversial for lateralized oropharyngeal cancer.•This matched analysis supports its safety in well-selected patients.•Unilateral radiotherapy reduces treatment-related toxicities.•Non-tonsillar tumors may also be eligible for unilateral radiotherapy. Unilateral vs Bilateral Neck Irradiation: The Importance of Careful Patient Selection in Tailoring Radiation Therapy for Lateralized Palatine-Tonsil and Non-Palatine-Tonsil Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. To compare oncologic outcomes of well-lateralized oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) following unilateral vs bilateral neck radiotherapy (RT). Patients with cT1-3 N0-2bM0 (TNM-7) OPC, treated with curative (chemo)RT in two institutions (2008–2019) were identified. For palatine tonsil tumor, unilateral neck RT was considered for tumor not invading beyond 1 cm of the tongue base or the soft palate without deep penetration. Unilateral neck RT was also considered for well-lateralized non-palatine tonsil tumor (i.e. base of tongue, soft palate or vallecula) within 1 cm of the lateral part of the mucosal corresponding oropharyngeal subsite without deep penetration. One-to-one propensity score-matched cohort of patients treated with unilateral vs bilateral neck RT was created according to patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The primary outcome was contralateral-only nodal failure (CNF, i.e., without local or ipsilateral regional failure). Secondary outcomes included local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). 346 patients were selected for the matched cohort (173 in each group), including 46 non-palatine tonsil tumors. The median follow-up was 5.1 years. The 5-year CNF, LF, RF, DM, DFS and OS for unilateral vs bilateral neck RT groups were 1 % (95 % CI: 0 %-3%) vs 0 %, 5 % (95 % CI: 3 %-10 %) vs 2 % (95 % CI: 0 %-5%), 4 % (95 % CI: 2 %-8%) vs 4 % (95 % CI: 2 %-8%), 5 % (95 % CI: 3 %-10 %) vs 6 % (95 % CI: 3 %-10 %), 80 % (95 % CI: 74 %-87 %) vs 79 % (95 % CI: 73 %-86 %), and 85 % (95 % CI: 80 %-91 %) vs 83 % (95 % CI: 78 %-90 %), respectively (p > 0.05 for all). One patient in the unilateral neck RT group had CNF after RT (cT2N2bM0 tonsillar cancer, successfully salvaged). Careful selection of well-lateralized OPC to receive unilateral neck RT results in favourable oncologic outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-8140
1879-0887
1879-0887
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111049