Evaluation of Light Gradient Boosted Machine Learning Technique in Large Scale Land Use and Land Cover Classification

The ability to rapidly produce accurate land use and land cover maps regularly and consistently has been a growing initiative as they have increasingly become an important tool in the efforts to evaluate, monitor, and conserve Earth’s natural resources. Algorithms for supervised classification of sa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironments (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 7; no. 10; p. 84
Main Authors McCarty, Dakota Aaron, Kim, Hyun Woo, Lee, Hye Kyung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 03.10.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2076-3298
2076-3298
DOI10.3390/environments7100084

Cover

More Information
Summary:The ability to rapidly produce accurate land use and land cover maps regularly and consistently has been a growing initiative as they have increasingly become an important tool in the efforts to evaluate, monitor, and conserve Earth’s natural resources. Algorithms for supervised classification of satellite images constitute a necessary tool for the building of these maps and they have made it possible to establish remote sensing as the most reliable means of map generation. In this paper, we compare three machine learning techniques: Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, and Light Gradient Boosted Machine, using a 70/30 training/testing evaluation model. Our research evaluates the accuracy of Light Gradient Boosted Machine models against the more classic and trusted Random Forest and Support Vector Machines when it comes to classifying land use and land cover over large geographic areas. We found that the Light Gradient Booted model is marginally more accurate with a 0.01 and 0.059 increase in the overall accuracy compared to Support Vector and Random Forests, respectively, but also performed around 25% quicker on average.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2076-3298
2076-3298
DOI:10.3390/environments7100084