Comparison of four specific dynamic office chairs with a conventional office chair: Impact upon muscle activation, physical activity and posture

Prolonged and static sitting postures provoke physical inactivity at VDU workplaces and are therefore discussed as risk factors for the musculoskeletal system. Manufacturers have designed specific dynamic office chairs featuring structural elements which promote dynamic sitting and therefore physica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied ergonomics Vol. 43; no. 2; pp. 296 - 307
Main Authors Ellegast, Rolf P., Kraft, Kathrin, Groenesteijn, Liesbeth, Krause, Frank, Berger, Helmut, Vink, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2012
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-6870
1872-9126
1872-9126
DOI10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.005

Cover

More Information
Summary:Prolonged and static sitting postures provoke physical inactivity at VDU workplaces and are therefore discussed as risk factors for the musculoskeletal system. Manufacturers have designed specific dynamic office chairs featuring structural elements which promote dynamic sitting and therefore physical activity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of four specific dynamic chairs on erector spinae and trapezius EMG, postures/joint angles and physical activity intensity (PAI) compared to those of a conventional standard office chair. All chairs were fitted with sensors for measurement of the chair parameters (backrest inclination, forward and sideward seat pan inclination), and tested in the laboratory by 10 subjects performing 7 standardized office tasks and by another 12 subjects in the field during their normal office work. Muscle activation revealed no significant differences between the specific dynamic chairs and the reference chair. Analysis of postures/joint angles and PAI revealed only a few differences between the chairs, whereas the tasks performed strongly affected the measured muscle activation, postures and kinematics. The characteristic dynamic elements of each specific chair yielded significant differences in the measured chair parameters, but these characteristics did not appear to affect the sitting dynamics of the subjects performing their office tasks.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-6870
1872-9126
1872-9126
DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.005