Determination of chlorothalonil metabolites in soil and water samples

• Published in: Journal of Chromatography A Vol. 1655; p. 462507
• Main Authors: Hintze, Simone, Hannalla, Youssef Sameh Bahgat, Guinchard, Sylvie, Hunkeler, Daniel, Glauser, Gaétan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 11.10.2021
• Subjects: agricultural soils; chlorothalonil; Chlorothalonil metabolites; chromatography; European Union; evolution; Groundwater; pesticide metabolites; QuEChERS; Soil extraction; solid phase extraction; sorption; SPE; UHPLC-MS/MS; SPE; UHPLC-MS/MS; Groundwater; Chlorothalonil metabolites; Soil extraction; QuEChERS
• ISSN: 0021-9673
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462507

•Five polar metabolites of chlorothalonil can be measured in both water and soil.•First method able to quantify sulfonated metabolites in soil.•Excellent sensitivity, precision and accuracy were obtained.•Metabolite detection frequency tends to be inversed in soil and groundwater samples. Pesticide metabolites are frequently detected in groundwater at concentrations often exceeding those of their parent pesticides. A well-known example is the metabolites of chlorothalonil, a non-systematic, broad spectrum fungicide. Some of the chlorothalonil metabolites occur frequently and at elevated concentrations in groundwater, which is why the use of chlorothalonil was recently banned in the European Union. To estimate the long-term evolution of the concentration of the chlorothalonil metabolites in groundwater after this ban, it is important to know if metabolite residues in soil and unsaturated zone can affect the concentrations in groundwater. We developed and validated a method for the determination of 5 chlorothalonil metabolites in soil (R471811, R417888, SYN507900, SYN548580 and R611968), including those which are frequently detected in groundwater. The developed protocols, based on a solid phase extraction approach (for R471811, R417888, SYN507900, SYN548580) or a QuEChERS approach (for R611968) followed by UHPLC-MS/MS analysis, provided excellent sensitivity (LOQ of 0.5 µg/kg for all metabolites), precision (RSD<10 % at low, medium and high concentrations) and accuracy (84-115 %). In addition, we developed a simple but highly sensitive (LOQ of 5-10 ng/L) direct-injection method for the analysis of these 5 metabolites in water to compare their occurrence in soil and groundwater. The application of these methods to agricultural soil samples and groundwater samples showed that the detection frequency of the 5 chlorothalonil metabolites in soil and groundwater seems to be inversed and dependent on their sorption coefficient. The latter might control the amount of the chlorothalonil metabolites which is retained in the soil or which leaches towards groundwater. Our results provide insights to estimate the retention of the different chlorothalonil metabolites in soil and unsaturated zone and therefore, to assess the influence of the soil and unsaturated zone on the long-term concentration evolution of these metabolites in groundwater.