How affective-motivational variables and approaches to learning predict mathematics achievement in upper elementary levels
The relationship between students' motivation and attitudes towards mathematics, the approaches to learning they use, and their achievement in mathematics has been widely documented in middle school and further academic levels. However, the empirical research in earlier educational stages remai...
Saved in:
Published in | Learning and individual differences Vol. 49; pp. 25 - 31 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Inc
01.07.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1041-6080 1873-3425 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.021 |
Cover
Summary: | The relationship between students' motivation and attitudes towards mathematics, the approaches to learning they use, and their achievement in mathematics has been widely documented in middle school and further academic levels. However, the empirical research in earlier educational stages remains scarce. This study analyzed the predictive value of affective-motivational variables and deep and surface approaches to learning on mathematics achievement in a sample of 524 upper elementary students. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the predictors of mathematics achievement. Mathematics enjoyment positively predicted mathematics achievement and age and the use of the surface approach to learning negatively predicted mathematics achievement. The variables in the model explained 21.3% of the variance in mathematics achievement. Mean differences in the affective-motivational variables and approaches to learning occurred between students with very high and very low achievement in mathematics, yielding further evidence of important differences between the achievement extremes.
•There is a significant relationship among the studied variables.•A surface approach to learning and age negatively predicts math achievement.•Mathematics enjoyment positively predicts achievement in the subject.•A small amount of variance of math achievement is explained by the variables.•Students at the extremes of achievement highly differed in the math-related variables. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1041-6080 1873-3425 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.021 |