Stronger Prejudices Are Associated With Decreased Model-Based Control

Background: Prejudices against minorities can be understood as habitually negative evaluations that are kept in spite of evidence to the contrary. Therefore, individuals with strong prejudices might be dominated by habitual or “automatic” reactions at the expense of more controlled reactions. Comput...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 767022
Main Authors Sebold, Miriam, Chen, Hao, Önal, Aleyna, Kuitunen-Paul, Sören, Mojtahedzadeh, Negin, Garbusow, Maria, Nebe, Stephan, Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Huys, Quentin J. M., Schlagenhauf, Florian, Rapp, Michael A., Smolka, Michael N., Heinz, Andreas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 05.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767022

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Prejudices against minorities can be understood as habitually negative evaluations that are kept in spite of evidence to the contrary. Therefore, individuals with strong prejudices might be dominated by habitual or “automatic” reactions at the expense of more controlled reactions. Computational theories suggest individual differences in the balance between habitual/model-free and deliberative/model-based decision-making. Methods: 127 subjects performed the two Step task and completed the blatant and subtle prejudice scale. Results: By using analyses of choices and reaction times in combination with computational modeling, subjects with stronger blatant prejudices showed a shift away from model-based control. There was no association between these decision-making processes and subtle prejudices. Conclusion: These results support the idea that blatant prejudices toward minorities are related to a relative dominance of habitual decision-making. This finding has important implications for developing interventions that target to change prejudices across societies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Kimberly Rios, Ohio University, United States
Reviewed by: Poppy Watson, University of New South Wales, Australia; Madalena Melo, University of Évora, Portugal
This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767022